Opinion
Featured Image
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin NetanyahuAlexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

June 14, 2021 (America’s Frontline Doctors) – To Prime Minister Binyamin Natanyahu,

There has been great confusion regarding treatment of the coronavirus. I am hoping you can help clear it up.

On December 11, 2020, the FDA offered an ‘Emergency Use Authorization’ for a Pfizer vaccine. On December 9, 2020 thousands of doses arrived at Ben Gurion airport. Did you officially order and receive incompletely tested drugs, even before they received the EUA? Is that even legal?

You proudly lauded the vaccine that would save us from lockdowns, distancing, and masks. But that word, ‘vaccine’, has confused us. Until February 5, 2021, the Merriam Webster dictionary defined it: A preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease. This was indeed the basis of all commonly known vaccines. In December, when they were introduced into Israel, it was still correct.  Remarkably, on February 6, a new definition appeared: a preparation of genetic material (such as a stand of synthesized mRNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein). Of course most of us were unaware of that significant modification. When the word ‘vaccine’ was heard, it was understood as the familiar, widely accepted treatment they and their children were familiar with. Mr. Prime Minister, don’t you think we deserved to be informed from the start that the injection was of a genetic modifying agent, and not a weakened virus?

When you declared these ‘vaccines’ were safe, and rolled up your own sleeve to prove it, how could you know? The WHO didn’t know. Pfizer didn’t know. The FDA didn’t know. After all, although they were still in the process of trial drug studies, they were rolled out at ‘Warp Speed’. They say they won’t know until at least 2023, if then. There is no proof these shots stop transmission, or prevent illness. They list 22 known side effects on their drug insert. Sadly we have learned of more.

Surely you knew that under EUA, unapproved medical products may be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. How grateful we would have been had your minister of health recommended Ivermectin, HCQ, Vitamins D and C, zinc or Querticin. Doctors who used them saved many lives. Some suggest at least 85% of those who died might have been saved. These safe, FDA- approved drugs could have provided the alternative. To add to the confusion, you actually used the phrase ‘FDA-approved’, as opposed to EUA, a number of times in describing the ‘vaccine’, including in that cute little video you posted on Purim 2021.

How much testing has actually been done on this ‘vaccine’ is another vague point. They’ve been working on it for decades, we’re told, yet it was never approved. We know the animals in the drug trials became very sick, and most died. Their auto-immune systems were destroyed, and they did not survive the next virus or flu season (ADE). In these past few years, no animal studies were done. Pfizer trials were done exclusively on humans. Whereas most new drugs or vaccines require 7-15 years or more, this brand new mRNA concept was rushed out to hundreds of millions in less than a year – for a virus with a remarkably high recovery rate.

You now proclaim the Green Passport is no more. Perhaps you are trying ease the stress by telling us we can again move freely, eat out, and work out.

If so, why are you forging ahead to jab our kids with an experimental drug that has not been tested for more than a few months on young children, who have not been nearly as badly affected at all by the virus – less than the seasonal flu.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1076468 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

Mr. Prime Minister, it’s time to end the confusion.

Why do children with 99.997% recovery rate need this shot at all?

Show us long-term studies.

Show us studies of how their immune systems will be affected in two years, in five.

Show us studies on the effect on future fertility.

Show us long-term neurological studies.

Show us what happened to the kids in the trial studies, including the paralyzed, the immune suppressed, and those who sadly died.

Explain how 14-year-olds, who need parental permission to go on a school trip, and who cannot legally buy cigarettes, can make an independent choice to take a drug that will affect them for the rest of their lives.

Stop the confusion. There is no pandemic. The virus is gone. Like the yearly flu, it comes and leaves. Now leave our children and us to go back to our lives.

One thing is clear. There are many trials taking place globally, including Nuremberg 2. Those who knowingly coerced, manipulated, lied to, or otherwise forced citizens to take this drug against their will, in violation of the Nuremberg Code, will be brought to justice.  

Your clarifying response would be greatly appreciated.

Published with permission from America’s Frontline Doctors.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.