Opinion
Featured Image
Abp. J. Michael Miller of Vancouver, B.C.Canuck Clay / YouTube

(LifeSiteNews) – Dear Archbishop Miller, about a week or so ago, when I was breastfeeding my newborn daughter, I read the news about the forcing of deacons in the Archdiocese of Vancouver to get the COVID vaccine or not be able to exercise their diaconate ministry. I am deeply troubled by your stance.

In particular, I am writing you publicly now because I wrote you privately a year ago with an apologetic you could use to resist unjust government pressure, and to offer you the legal help of the best lawyer I’ve worked with in 20 years of resisting institutional censorship. I have watched in dismay as, for example, you caved to government pressure and closed your churches for public worship. With this latest decision, I am compelled to raise my voice again, and hope doing so publicly will assist you more to change course.

You know I love the Church and the Archdiocese of Vancouver, in which I was reared. You know I have faithfully served her throughout my life. In particular, I have trained her seminarians and priests for 20 years, spoken in recent years at a training seminar for her deacons, served on her communications board, and trained parents at Catholic schools through one of CISVA’s programs. I have MC’ed at the One Conference. I have donated to local parishes as well as to Project Advance and various ministries run by RCAV. So yes, I love the Catholic Church and I love the Archdiocese of Vancouver. But I am very, very disappointed. As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., once said, “There can be no disappointment where there is not deep love.”

While nursing my baby, I couldn’t help but think of the Scripture passage: “How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers!” (Matthew 24:19). I say this because your position, as outlined in Monsignor Gregory Smith’s letter, along with how the archdiocese has caved to government pressure over the last year, is leading to the abandonment of the next generation of lay faithful.

I think to myself, “What kind of world and church am I bringing up my daughter in? Will she know her shepherds to be courageous and bold? Will she see her spiritual fathers being like the Hebrew midwives who feared God more than they feared man? Or will she see leaders in the institution her Savior set up act as people who cave, time and again, to ungodly government pressure?” Moreover, how will your stance impact Catholic ministries who I dearly hope do not follow your example, or the also-poor examples of the Toronto and Moncton Archdioceses?

You are indirectly contributing to the fast-growing system of animosity, contempt, and discrimination that is growing towards those who decline having an experimental vaccine, that lacks long-term testing, injected into their bodies. There are faithful Catholics at risk of losing their jobs, at risk of not being able to provide for their families, because they refuse the vaccine, and by your decision to force deacons to be vaccinated, it is no different from secular workplaces forcing their employees to be vaccinated.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge the Quebec Knights of Columbus to REVERSE draconian vaccination requirements
  Show Petition Text
2928 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The Knights of Columbus in Quebec have apparently begun to pressurize and bully unvaccinated council members and officers who decline to take the COVID jab.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to the Quebec Knights of Columbus, urging the Catholic men's fraternal organization to reverse course and stop penalizing Knights who refuse these unethical, untested and unsafe vaccines.

According to a letter obtained by LifeSiteNews, the leaders of the Quebec State Council of the Knights have seemingly implemented the following restrictions on unvaccinated members: 1) Effective immediately, unvaccinated knights shall be refused access to meeting and social venues; and, 2) Effective November 15th, any officer not "fully vaccinated" shall be relieved of his duties.

If true (and, there is no reason to believe it is not accurate), this Quebec Knights' policy is not only deeply flawed, but also deeply disturbing.

Indeed, the Catholic Church teaches that a Catholic may use his or her conscience to decide to licitly refuse vaccination.

And, while the Church is allowing Catholics to take these unethical vaccines because of the lack of an ethically produced and tested vaccine, it must noted that the Church IS AGAINST FORCED VACCINATION and vaccine mandates.

Therefore, it is difficult to fathom how a Catholic organization can penalize (and, in effect, try to coerce) Catholics to accept vaccines which have many morally and medically troubling aspects.

To start with, all COVID vaccines available to Knights Quebecois were either developed or tested using aborted fetal cell lines! This very fact should militate against penalizing Knights who cannot accept these jabs, in good conscience, as morally repugnant per se.

And, there are at least three other serious issues with the vaccines, namely:

  1. The vaccines are, themselves, unsafe. The WHO has already reported over 2.1M injuries related to COVID jabs, worldwide.
  2. The vaccines do not effectively stop transmission, and, in fact, probably facilitate transmission by allowing a vaccinated person to carry a large viral load which they can then spread to vaccinated and unvaccinated, alike.
  3. It is unwise to take and promote vaccines which have not undergone sufficient testing (animal, and otherwise), and which have no track record for possible long-term negative complications. Whereas most vaccines have taken between six and ten years to be fully tested and approved, these COVID jabs have only been given for less than a year -- and so, we do not know what the long-term effects will be.

With these issues in mind, please SIGN and SHARE this petition which calls on the Quebec Knights of Columbus State Council to reverse the draconian restrictions being placed against unvaccinated Knights.

The Quebec Knights of Columbus should be prepared to make reasonable accommodations for those members and officers who have decided to refuse these unethical, untested and unsafe vaccines.

After signing, please take a few minutes to contact the Quebec Knights of Columbus to politely, but firmly, ask them to reverse this decision which could seriously impinge on their fellow Knights' ability to follow their consciences in relation to taking a COVID vaccine.

Quebec Knights of Columbus Telephone Numbers: 450-768-0616 or 1866-893-3681

Quebec Knights of Columbus Email: [email protected]

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 

**Photo Credit: Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

How can such individuals find solace and support in the local church when you are doing the same thing? I’ve watched as our Protestant brothers and sisters have courageously stood up against Canada’s tyranny, including pastors being arrested, while Catholic leadership has acquiesced to unjust rules.

In Monsignor Smith’s letter, he asserts that taking the vaccine is for the good of one’s neighbor, though several orthodox Catholic theologians have disputed this, including Dr. Janet Smith. I would simply add the following:

Even the COVID-vaccine-supporting CDC says, “COVID-19 vaccines are effective at protecting you [emphasis added] from getting sick…If you are fully vaccinated and become infected with the Delta variant, you can spread the virus to others.” So, people should not be misled to believe that receipt of the vaccine is a Good Samaritan act.

But there is a more fundamental moral issue. According to the Principle of Totality and Integrity, often used in Catholic bioethical discussions, we have a responsibility to maintain our bodies in a healthy and functioning state as they are designed. We may not intentionally maim or harm our bodies (e.g., have a vasectomy); or, if we do indeed do something that changes the body (e.g., remove an organ or limb), it has to be done for the overall health of that particular body (such as eliminate cancer). If we do share something from our bodies (e.g., blood, bone marrow, or kidney), we may only do so if it doesn’t compromise the overall functioning of our own bodies (e.g., it is wrong for a living donor to donate their heart because doing so would kill oneself whereas donating blood would not).

Stephanie Gray Connors and her newborn daughter.

Yet, here is the key point: We are under no moral duty to share parts of our body (such as blood). Instead, it is a free will act of generosity or even heroism (e.g., kidney donation).

My body parts do not exist for your body; instead they exist for mine, and therefore you cannot claim a right to those parts (the exception being if my body parts are actually designed for another, such as my breasts and uterus which exist for my offspring who can therefore claim a right to access the parts which are designed for them).

Acknowledging this, that means that just as I have no duty to take blood out of my body and share it with someone else, I have no duty to put the COVID vaccine into my body to benefit someone else. In fact, I have a duty to maintain the overall health and functioning of my own body. Thus, if I have legitimate concerns that an experimental vaccine which lacks long-term testing, and has shown adverse events in some recipients, could harm my body, I should not ingest it. Even if I think the benefit outweighs the harm and I want to help another by taking it, I am under no obligation to do so. The action remains an act of generosity, and acts of generosity can be manifested in different ways. The person, for instance, who does not give blood or kidneys can still be generous and merciful to their neighbor. Likewise, the person who does not take a COVID vaccine can also be generous and merciful to their neighbor.

I myself contracted COVID in early August, in the last week of my pregnancy. A spiking fever (especially dangerous to a pre-born child) caused my husband to rush me to the hospital and, while there, they tested me for COVID and it came back positive. I experienced all kinds of mercies and generosity from others that did not include the vaccine: My husband served and touched me rather than isolating from me as though I was a leper. My neighbor did runs to the grocery store. I found a physician who gave me immediate treatment with inexpensive, well-tested and widely-used medicines of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin that protected me and my pre-born child from harm. My husband, my neighbor, and my doctor all showed mercy which did not involve the vaccine. In fact, they did more for me by their actions than if they themselves had received the vaccine.

All that said, my hope is the following:

  • That you will reverse your requirement that deacons be vaccinated.
  • That you will reinforce and fight for conscience rights and speak against any effort to deny peoples’ freedoms when it comes to forced vaccination, vaccine passports, job security, etc. In particular, you will implore your brother bishops and Catholic ministry leaders to do the same.
  • That you will refuse to acquiesce to unjust and unreasonable government demands and restrictions. As I mentioned a year ago, I implore you to take the services of legal groups like the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.
  • Remind church-goers, the public, and the government that Church is different. It is a place of sanctuary. “All who are thirsty, all who are weak…come to the table.” Churches should reinforce Jesus’ love of the least of these and His acts of mercy and how He embraced lepers. Saints like Damien and Mother Teresa should be featured and studied.
  • Acknowledge that there are various opinions within the Church and emphasize that people who want to get vaccinated should not force others to. If the vaccine works then the vaccinated should already feel safe.

It is troubling that those not vaccinated are being blamed for society not returning to normal. I now live in Florida and the vaccination rate here is lower than in Canada and yet in Florida we are back to normal while Canada is not. That is evidence that restoring a reasonable way of life is not dependent on getting vaccinated.

And so, in this time, we need to count on our churches to resist the unjust demands of the government and culture. Now, more than ever, we need the voice of our shepherds and the sanctuary of our churches. Coercion and discrimination must be rejected and people ought to be encouraged to live in fellowship and communion rather than immerse themselves in the divided, isolated, fearful, anxiety-driven mindset of our culture.

Archbishop Miller, I implore you to do the right thing.

Your daughter in Christ,

Stephanie Gray Connors

For respectful communication:

Archbishop Michael Miller

4885 Saint John Paul II Way
Vancouver BC V5Z 0G3

Phone: (604) 683-0281
Fax: (604) 683-4288

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.