Featured Image
Pop-star 'Pink'Pink YouTube screenshot

Life is WINNING. Will you donate today to support LifeSite’s coverage of this momentous decision in the pro-life movement? We will need your help to continue our pro-life news now more than ever 

(LifeSiteNews) – Authority is a funny thing. Defined as the “power to influence or command thought, opinion, or behavior,” authority can be used to bring about good, or it can be used to bring about evil.

Theoretically, those in authority should be strong moral leaders who help others grow as human beings, who teach people to care for others, and whose examples we wish to emulate. But this is not always the case. And lately we’ve seen people using their authority to not only spew anger and hatred but to disseminate misinformation.

Take, for example, pop singer Pink, who felt compelled to share her ignorant and misinformed remarks regarding the SCOTUS case that returned the decision about abortion to the states. She tweeted: “Let’s be clear: If you believe the government belongs in a woman’s uterus, a gay persons [sic] business or marriage, or that racism is okay- THEN PLEASE IN THE NAME OF YOUR LORD NEVER F**KING LISTEN TO MY MUSIC AGAIN. AND ALSO F**K RIGHT OFF. We good?”

It’s almost comical, isn’t it? She begins by talking about abortion, then throws in two things that Dobbs was NOT about, and ends by telling people who disagree with her to f**k off. Then she asks if we’re good.

READ: Beyond Dobbs: Reflections on Abe Lincoln, Roe, and the rights of the unborn

Make no mistake: The Dobbs decision dealt only with abortion. It had nothing to do with gay rights or racism or anything else. No one on the Supreme Court is advocating for racism! But her comments, and those of other Hollywood “elites” — such as Whoopi Goldberg in her latest rant — are meant to stir up anger. In fact, I would go so far as to say that their point is to obfuscate so that people lose sight of the true meaning of the Dobbs ruling.

Let’s be clear about two things because mainstream media has had a field day stirring the pot and stoking fears regarding what “could” happen after this ruling.

First, while Roe v. Wade was reversed, abortion is not going to be illegal everywhere. The decision regarding abortion is simply being returned to the states to decide. Some states will allow it. Some will allow it in certain circumstances. And some will make it illegal.

Second, SCOTUS did not base its decision on religion, as many people state. The justices looked at the Constitution and based their decision on the fact that there is no “right” to abortion in the 14th Amendment — or anywhere in the Constitution. They examined the laws of the states regarding abortion when the 14th Amendment was written. They read what the Founding Fathers wrote. And they made a decision based on those facts.

But those people spreading hate and vitriol do not care about the facts. They want to intimidate, threaten, and incite violence until they get what they want.

This is evidenced by a growing list of disturbing actions by fanatical groups determined to show their anger.

The list could go on and on.

If this isn’t the epitome of bullying, I don’t know what is.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stand WITH Justice Clarence Thomas, AGAINST Abortion Fanatics Like Hillary Clinton
  Show Petition Text
2545 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 4000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Ever since the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling overturning Roe v. Wade and returning the ongoing debate over the barbaric practice of abortion back to the states, left-wing zealots, politicians, and rioters have taken to the streets and the airwaves to fan the flames of division.

And perhaps no one has epitomized this unhinged rage more than twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Taking her anger out on Justice Clarence Thomas, Clinton has once again shown her propensity for bitterness, hostility towards our Constitution and rule of law, and hatred towards those with differing philosophies from her own.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition in support of Justice Clarence Thomas against hateful attacks by radical liberals like Hillary Clinton.

The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which saw a 6-3 majority rule in favor of overturning both Roe v. Wade and 1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey, was a long time coming: In 1973, seven Justices of the Supreme Court (all males) created a phony constitutional "right" to abortion out of thin air, opening the floodgates to practically unfettered access to abortion across the nation and resulting in the killing of more than 60 million innocent, unborn babies in the nearly 50 years that followed.

But with Roe now out of the picture, this decision will officially fall back to the states, who, by way of their elected lawmakers, may now opt to permit, restrict, or even outright ban the practice of abortion altogether. 

And while the majority opinion in Dobbs was penned by Associate Justice Samuel Alito, most of the left's ire in the aftermath of its publication has been directed at a different Justice: Conservative constitutionalist Clarence Thomas, currently the bench's only African-American member, who wrote his own separate concurrence acknowledging other past cases which were decided on similar, constitutionally-lacking bases that could potentially be revisited in the future.

Perhaps no disgruntled abortion supporter has gone out of their way more to deride this ruling and Justice Thomas than former First Lady and Obama Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who let her utter contmept for the unborn, the Constitution, and Justice Thomas show in a CBS interview with Gayle King earlier this week.

In her deeply personal attack, Clinton claimed that Justice Thomas, a Yale Law School classmate of hers in the early 1970s (when Roe was first decided), was a "person of grievance for as long as I've known him. Resentment, grievance, anger."

She then went on to criticize the court's ruling in Dobbs, repeating without evidence that "women are going to die" as a result, all while (predictably) ignoring the potentially millions of unborn babies who will now live because of Justices' timely decision.

So while pro-abortion liberals like Hillary Clinton continue to lament the outcome of Dobbs and smear conservative Justices like Clarence Thomas with personal attacks simply for abiding by the text of the Constitution, the pro-life movement and millions of Americans who believe in the constitutional right to life can take pride in nearly half a century's work to achieve the end of Roe, and begin the real work of ending the barbaric practice of abortion in the United States.

Now is the time to put out-of-touch elitists like Hillary Clinton on notice that momentum is on the side of life once again and that America is rejecting the culture of death that has penetrated our way of life for far too long.

Now is the time to stand with pro-life, conservative constitutionalists like Justice Clarence Thomas!

SIGN and SHARE this petition in support of Justice Clarence Thomas against attacks from leftists like Hillary Clinton, and thank him for courageously standing up for life and the Constitution!

Thank you!


'Hillary Clinton attacks Clarence Thomas as a ‘person of grievance’ following Roe reversal' (LifeSiteNews)

  Hide Petition Text

How have we become a country filled with people who harbor so much anger, not only for the preborn baby, but for churches, pregnancy centers, and for those who want to help moms and babies? Don’t people realize that, by destroying these centers, they are hurting the women they claim to be advocating for?

Though we must always deal lovingly with people, now is the time to take a stand. We too have authority. Whether we are pro-life leaders, mothers and fathers, businessmen and women, or simply members of a community, it is our job to teach the truth about the Dobbs ruling, to teach the facts about the preborn baby, to explain what the ruling is and is not about, and to assuage any fears that people like Pink attempt to stir up.

If we do not have the moral courage to articulate these truths, young people and those who easily follow will hear only half-truths and opinions, thus rendering them unable to make an informed decision.

Our country desperately needs outstanding authority figures, and those in the pro-life sector have the unique ability to stand up and be those figures. Let us not hesitate to seize this opportunity.

Susan Ciancio is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame and has worked as a writer and editor for nearly 19 years; 13 of those years have been in the pro-life sector. Currently, she is the editor of American Life League’s Celebrate Life Magazine—the nation’s premier Catholic pro-life magazine. She is also the executive editor of ALL’s Culture of Life Studies Program—a pre-K-12 Catholic pro-life education organization.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.