Featured Image

Pornography has spread like a plague across the nation. It has moved from the margins of our culture to the mainstream, undermining marriages, families, and communities. Worst of all, it has stolen a time of innocence from our children.

Some pornography, specifically “obscenity” and “child pornography,” is illegal and not protected by the First Amendment. Shamefully, the overwhelming majority of this illegal hardcore pornography on the Internet is produced in the United States. Decades ago Congress passed federal laws against child pornography and obscenity and those laws have been found to be constitutional. They are too seldom enforced, however. Family Research Council (FRC) calls for the vigorous enforcement of all pornography laws.

Even the pornography that enjoys constitutional protection as “free speech” can be regulated. Laws may regulate the time, place, and manner of distribution and may restrict it from children. We do not have adequate laws to protect children from this kind of material online, and FRC will continue to work toward stronger laws to protect children.

Whether legal or not, pornography alters both sexual attitudes and behavior, undermining marriage, which in turn undermines the stability of the entire community. Because it is a threat to marriages, the family, and society at large, consuming pornography cannot be seen as a private choice without public consequence.

Pornography and the Family

Pornography viewing leads to a loss of interest in good family relations. Married men who are involved in pornography feel less satisfied with their conjugal relations and less emotionally attached to their wives.[1] Pornography use is a pathway to infidelity and divorce, and is frequently a major factor in these family disasters. Couples affected by one spouse's addiction usually experience a loss of interest in sexual intercourse and good family relations.[2] Both spouses perceive pornography viewing as tantamount to infidelity.[3] Pornography use and “cybersex” can often be just as damaging to family relationships as real-life infidelity, and this estrangement has tangible consequences: when viewing pornography becomes an addiction, a troubling percentage of “sex addicts” lose their spouses, 58 percent suffer considerable financial losses, and about a third lose their jobs.[4],[5]

Pornography devastates marriages, as husbands report to loving their spouses less due to the addiction, and the wives of these users have deep psychological wounds, with feelings of betrayal, mistrust, and anger towards their partner, sometimes requiring clinical treatment for trauma.[6]

Pornography affects all members of the family. Not only does it eliminate an affectionate family life, children can experience traumas related to encounters with their parents' pornographic material. A study of adolescents revealed that viewing sexually explicit internet materials can significantly increase their uncertainties about sexuality, can lower their self-esteem, and bring about feelings of loneliness and depression.[7]

Click “like” if you say NO to porn!

Pornography and the Individual

Pornography is addictive, and neuroscientists are beginning to map the biological substrate of this addiction. Users tend to become desensitized to and bored with the type of pornography they use, seeking more perverse forms of sexual imagery.[8] Men who view pornography regularly have a higher tolerance for abnormal sexuality, including rape, sexual aggression, and sexual promiscuity.[9] Prolonged consumption of pornography by men produces notions of women as commodities or as “sex objects.”[10] Pornography engenders greater sexual permissiveness, leading to a greater risk of out-of-wedlock births and STDs.[11] Child-sex offenders are more likely to view pornography regularly or to be involved in its distribution.[12]

Pornography changes the habits of the mind, and its use can easily become habitual, leading to desensitization, boredom, distorted views of reality, and an objectification of women (and of men). A greater amount of sexual stimuli becomes necessary to arouse habitual users, leading them to pursue more deviant forms of pornography to fulfill their sexual desires, e.g., watching “depictions of group sex, sadomasochistic practices, and sexual contact with animals.”[13]

Pornography and the Community

The presence of sexually-oriented businesses significantly harms the surrounding community, leading to increases in crime and decreases in property values.[14] Pornography viewing and sexual offense are inextricably linked. There is a connection between the consumption of violent pornography with behavioral aggression and the incidence of rape.[15]

Today's media-saturated society has made it much harder for parents to protect their children from pornography. The growth of digital media and the internet have allowed pornographers to harness technology for their own profits. Studies have shown that individuals who were convicted of the collection and distribution of internet child pornography had also committed an average of over thirteen different child sex abuses.[16]


The main defenses against pornography are close family life, a good marriage, and good relations between parents and children, coupled with deliberate parental monitoring of internet use. Additionally, the research demonstrates that a mother, a father, and children who worship together regularly compose the healthiest kind of family unit. Traditionally, government has kept a tight lid on sexual traffic and businesses, but in matters of pornography, that lid has been loosened substantially, except where child pornography is concerned. FRC calls for aggressive enforcement of all pornography laws. Given the massive, deleterious individual, marital, family, and social effects of pornography, we cannot afford to let the government abdicate its duty to enforce the people's duly-enacted laws.

General Resources:

  • Porn Harms (pornharms.com) – Leading national organization opposing pornography and indecency through public education and the application of law.
  • Sex Addicts Anonymous (SAA, saa-recovery.org) – A recovery program based on the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) adapted, with permission, for recovery from sex addiction.
  • Sexaholics Anonymous (SA, sa.org) – A recovery program based on the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) adapted, with permission, for recovery from sex addiction.
  • Recovering Couples Anonymous (RCA, recovering-couples.org) – A recovery program based on the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) adapted, with permission, for couples recovering from sex addiction.
  • S-Anon(sanon.org) – A recovery program for men and women whose lives have been affected by someone else's compulsive sexual behavior. It is based on the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) adapted, with permission, for couples recovering from sex addiction.
  • Co-dependents of Sex Addicts (COSA, cosa-recovery.org) – A recovery program for men and women whose lives have been affected by their partner or spouse's compulsive sexual behavior. It is based on the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) adapted, with permission, for couples recovering from sex addiction.
  • Recovering Couples Anonymous (RCA, recovering-couples.org) – A recovery program for men and women whose lives have been affected by their partner or spouse's compulsive sexual behavior. It is based on the principles of Alcoholics Anonymous (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) adapted, with permission, for couples recovering from sex addiction.

Protecting Children against Pornography

Prevention and Help For Those in the Pornography/Sex Industry

  • CyberTip Line (report.cybertip.org) – Official place to file complaints with the Federal Government about child pornography and suspected child sexual exploitation. Directed by The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in connection with the FBI.
  • The Pink Cross Foundation (thepinkcross.org)- help for those in the porn industry
  • Shelley Lubben (shelleylubben.com) – A former performer in pornography, turned anti-porn activist. Helps many performers get out of the industry and transition to life they want to have.
  • Sex Industry Survivors Anonymous (sexindustrysurvivors.org), or check out Anne Bissell's website (annebissell.com).
  • Girls Educational and Mentoring Services' (GEMS, gems-girls.org) – A mentoring organization with a mission is to empower girls and young women, ages 12-24, who have experienced commercial sexual exploitation and domestic trafficking to exit the commercial sex industry and develop to their full potential.
  • LightDancers (lightdancers.us) – Faith-based outreach to for exotic dancers.
  • JC's Girls (jcsgirls.org) – Women's ministry, started by a former stripper, to help women who currently are or have been in the Adult Entertainment Industry

Cathy Cleaver Ruse is a Senior Fellow for Legal Studies at the Family Research Council. Ruse has also served as legal counsel and program director for the National Law Center for Children and Families, a law firm devoted to strengthening and defending laws against pornography. Reprinted with permission from FRC.org.


[1] Dolf Zillman and Jennings Bryant, “Pornography's Impact on Sexual Satisfaction,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18 (1988): 438-53 (439-440).

[2] Steven Stack, Ira Wasserman, and Roger Kern, “Adult Social Bonds and Use of Internet Pornography,” Social Science Quarterly 85 (2004); 75-88; Jill Manning, Senate Testimony, November 10, 2005, referencing: J. Dedmon, “Is the Internet bad for your marriage? Online affairs, pornographic sites playing greater role in divorces.” 2002, press release from American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 14.; J.P. Schneider, “Effects of Cybersex Addiction on the Family,” Sex and the Internet: A Guidebook for Clinicians, ed. A. Cooper (New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2002): 39-40.

[3] Monica Therese Whitty, “Pushing the Wrong Buttons: Men's and Women's Attitudes toward Online and Offline Infidelity.” Cyber Psychology & Behavior 6 (2003): 568-79.

[4] Zillman and Bryant, “Pornography's Impact on Sexual Satisfaction,” 438-53; Schneider, “Effects of Cybersex Addiction on the Family,” 31-58; Barbara A. Steffens and Robyn L. Rennie, “The Traumatic Nature of Disclosure for Wives of Sexual Addicts,” Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 13 (2006): 247-67.

[5] Mary Anne Layden, Ph.D. (Center for Cognitive Therapy, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania). Testimony for U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, November 18, 2004, 2.

[6] Peter Jochen and Patti M. Valkenburg, “Adolescents' Exposure to Sexually Explicit Internet Material, Sexual Uncertainty, and Attitudes Toward Uncommitted Sexual Exploration: Is There a Lin?” Communication Research 35 (2008): 596; Todd G. Morrison, Shannon R. Ellis, Melanie A. Morrison, Anomi Bearden, and Rebecca L. Harriman, “Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material and Variations in Body Esteem, Genital Attitudes, and Sexual Esteem Among a Sample of Canadian Men,” The Journal of Men's Studies 14 (2006): 209-22 (216-7); Michele L. Ybarra and Kimberly J. Mitchell, “Exposure to Internet Pornography among Children and Adolescents: A National Survey,” CyberPsychology & Behavior 8 (2005): 473-86 (479).

[7] Zillman and Bryant, “Pornography's Impact on Sexual Satisfaction,” 448.

[8] Dolf Zillman, “Influence of Unrestrained Access to Erotica on Adolescents' and Young Adults' Dispositions toward Sexuality,” Journal of Adolescent Health 27S (2000): 41.

[9] Vanessa Vega and Neil M. Malamuth, “Predicting Sexual Aggression: The Role of Pornography in the Context of General and Specific Risk Factors,” Aggressive Behavior 33 (2007): 104-17 (109); Zillman, “Influence of Unrestrained Access to Erotica,” 42.

[10] Peter Jochen and Patti M. Valkenburg, “Adolescents' Exposure to a Sexualized Media Environment and Their Notions of Women as Sex Objects,” Sex Roles 56 (2007): 381-395 (390).

[11] Nicole Daluga, “A Content Analysis of Sexual Risk and Protective Behaviors and Messages in Sexually Explicit Web Pages Viewed by a National Probability Sample of U.S. Adolescents” (Atlanta, Georgia: Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, 2002), 255-279; Gina M. Wingood, Ralph J. DiClemente, Kathy Harrington, Suzy Davies, Edward W. Hook, and M. Kim Oh, “Exposure to X-rated Movies and Adolescents' Sexual and Contraceptive-related Attitudes and Behaviors,” Pediatrics 107 (2001): 1116-19.

[12] W.L. Marshall, “The Use of Sexually Explicit Stimuli by Rapists, Child Molesters, and Nonoffenders,” The Journal of Sex Research 25 (1988): 267-288 (279).

[13] Zillman, “Influence of Unrestrained Access to Erotica,” 41; James B. Weaver III, “The Effects of Pornography Addiction on Families and Communities,” (Testimony presented before the Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Washington, D.C., November 18, 2004), 3.

[14] “Protecting Communities from Sexually Oriented Businesses,” 2nd ed. (Scottsdale, AZ: Alliance Defense Fund, November 2002).

[15] Richard McCleary, “Crime Risk in the Vicinity of a Sexually Oriented Business: A Report to the Centralia City Attorney's Office” (Revised Report, February 28, 2004).

[16] Michael L. Bourke and Andres E. Hernandez, “The 'Butner Study' Redux: A Report of Incidence of Hands-on Child Victimization by Child Pornography Offenders,” Journal of Family Violence 24 (2009): 183-91 (187).


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.