October 15, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – I am compelled to write this article, “Real Women Don't Like Lust”, in response to the various media (movies, magazines, music, television and print) continually promoting and falsely characterizing women as sex objects and as insatiable wild lusty types while in reality all the emphasis on 'sex' and 'sexy' and 'sex lives' separated from real meaning and purpose is having the exact opposite effect- driving couples further apart and in the long run making women feel kind of pukey about it all.

I've become so frustrated by these dishonest, inaccurate and harmful portrayals of truly beautiful and life-bearing woman and the obnoxious emphasis on the errant notion of a 'sex life' that I came up with the following to express my thoughts:

There should be no such thing as a sex life. There is “married life” and within it, the many expressions of love which includes the physical renewal of the wedding vows.


Personally, I am just sick to death of ‘sexy’.  When a person looks ‘sexy’, doesn’t it means they look ready for sex?  I thought only prostitutes were supposed to look like that.  Ladies, how about some new adjectives?  How about…. BEAUTIFUL? How about…. LOVELY? How about ELEGANT?

I received the testimony below from a woman who has experienced that very aversion that happens to women over time in this culture.  She enthusiastically relates what a difference moral family planning (a.k.a.- the practice of chastity in marriage) has made in the intimate area of their marriage and in her attitude toward the renewal of their wedding vows: 

NFP.  Although our marriage was difficult, my husband was willing to join me in my advocacy of NFP during our first 17 years of our marriage, when we were happy to welcome more children, and we had no real reason to avoid another pregnancy.  However, after 8 children and being in my 40’s, with children aging from teens to toddler, and a husband who was unwilling to pitch in with significant help, I felt overwhelmed and unable to handle another baby, at least for a time. 

I conferred with him about our serious situation, and as he didn’t seem to care much I decided to use NFP for the first time to postpone pregnancy.

But when it came time to abstain, my husband was NOT happy!  He came into the faith late, and therefore had never had to exercise much discipline in that area; not as a teen, not in single life, and not in married life.  In our culture, from the time boys begin to feel any urges at all, they are encouraged to release them; they are certainly not told they need to conquer them.  We were both born and raised in that culture.

When we first looked at actually using NFP to avoid pregnancy, we had mistakenly assumed there would be two week stretches without intimacy and he staunchly refused to consider such a sacrifice.  This led to months of upheaval, as I was panicked every month, and he was sick of my emotional swings.  I was angry with him that he couldn’t contain himself for my sake.  He was mad because I was not…enthusiastically participating in our intimate life.  I know this is connected with a feeling of rejection, so he likely felt that way too.

Finally he said he was going to get a vasectomy as he felt this would solve the ‘problem’.  I was devastated!  Not only for the fact that he would be committing a grave moral evil, but, admittedly, because there would be no reason for me to say ‘no’ to sex, at any time. 

I’d done enough reflecting on sexuality that I knew the effects of objectification, and I knew that I would end up feeling used for gratification if we were trying to avoid pregnancy without having to abstain.

It was during this reflection that I recognized that, in spite of contraception, this divide still exists between men and women in our culture.  It is considered comical, and quite normal, for a woman to feign a headache in order to avoid making love to her husband, as evidenced in TV, movies and magazines.
We had to go get some NFP training, I pleaded insistingly.  He agreed to go to a class.

The relationship part had a huge impact on me.   I remember the instructor saying that lust can never be satisfied, and that pretty much summed up what I felt was happening, and would continue to happen in our marriage, if we didn’t use NFP.

Reluctantly, my husband agreed to give it a shot.  I won’t bore you with all of the details, (although for men this would be the most important info) but this experience has proven to my husband, more categorically than anything else, that God knows what He’s talking about! 

We have had more intimacy, and more enthusiastic intimacy that we had in the first 17 years of our marriage.  He is stunned to see me invite him to union, which was a constant source of strain in our marriage before.  He didn’t feel loved, and neither did I. 

The best way I can define it is this: during the stretches of abstinence I see him giving; giving me peace of mind, giving me love in the countless other kindnesses that I know are not just a prelude to sex.  During our infertile times, I am so in love with him for his generosity that I desperately want to be near him.  I am thrilled to have that closeness with him, and I want to give him all that I can. 

NFP has been a tremendous blessing, in ways that I never imagined, and on a level of depth of heart and soul that I didn’t even know existed between two people.

Living in this culture I don’t think people think there is another way and it is difficult to admit, “I’m sick of it all!!”  But, there really is another way as evidenced by the above testimony- a way that is much more fulfilling, satisfying and loving.  And it has everything to do with love and nothing to do with the counterfeit the media promotes as love- icky old lust.

For a time a woman may participate and engage in the marriage act where lust is predominant, but after a time, especially after infatuation has faded… well… everyone knows what “I have a headache” is referring to AND everyone knows that the one saying it is… THE WOMAN.

Why is it that the woman is the one getting the headaches??

I have some suggestions in to offer in Part 3, “Why Women Get…Headaches”. See part 1 here


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.