Featured Image

August 12, 2015 (AlexSchadenberg) — A study released in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) analyzing the euthanasia deaths in the first year of operation at the Netherlands euthanasia clinic appears to have been done to prove that euthanasia is being done carefully at the clinic. 

The study: A study of the First Year of the End-of-Life Clinic for Physician-Assisted Dying in the Netherlands was published online on August 10, 2015.

The data shows that in its first year of operation (March 1, 2012 – March 1, 2013) the Netherlands euthanasia clinic received 645 requests for assisted death and lethally injected 162 people. 

Of the 162 who died by an assisted death, the data indicates that 6 assisted deaths were done for psychological reasons, 21 assisted deaths were done for cognitive decline, such as dementia and 11 assisted deaths were done based on “tired of living.” Tired of living means that the person does not have any specific illness.

The study indicates that woman represented 62% (Table 1) of the requests for euthanasia and 65% (Table 3) of the euthanasia deaths.

This study represented the first year of operation for the euthanasia clinic. A recent news report indicated that the number of euthanasia deaths for psychiatric patients has increased substantially.  Last month, the media reported that, in the first six months of 2015, 18 euthanasia deaths were done based on psychiatric reasons at the euthanasia clinic. The media report stated:

This is more than double the total figure of 17 in 2014 as a whole, the clinic’s first half figures show. 

In addition, almost 100 psychiatric patients are on the waiting list for help, the NRC said. This is because of a shortage of psychiatrists to make the assessments and manage the requests.

The Netherlands euthanasia clinic has also been implicated in several controversial euthanasia deaths, for instance: 

A similar study examining 100 consecutive requests for euthanasia for psychiatric reasons in Belgium was published on July 28, 2015 found that of the 100 requests for euthanasia for psychiatric reasons 48 were approved for lethal injection and 35 died by lethal injection.

Both studies appear to be in response to criticism of the expanding practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands and Belgium.

In July 2014, Theo Boer, an ethicist and a nine year member of a Netherlands euthanasia regional review committee stated that:

I used to be a supporter of legislation. But now, with twelve years of experience, I take a different view.

Boer changed his mind based on the increasing number of euthanasia deaths and the increasing reasons for euthanasia in the Netherlands. 

Boer is also concerned that people, who have years to live, are dying by euthanasia in the Netherlands.

The 2013 Netherlands euthanasia report indicated that the number of reported euthanasia deaths increased by 15% to 4829 and the number of euthanasia deaths for psychiatric reasons tripled to 42 and the number of euthanasia deaths for people with dementia had more than doubled to 97.

The Netherlands euthanasia clinic opened on March 1, 2012. They began with 15 mobile euthanasia teams and have now expanded to 39 mobile euthanasia teams. According to the study, there were 645 requests for euthanasia in the first year, 749 requests for euthanasia in the second year and 1035 requests for euthanasia in the third year.

Learn about how euthanasia became socially approved in the Netherlands by purchasing the book by Gerbert van Loenen, a Dutch journalist titled: Do You Call This A Life? Blurred Boundaries in the Netherlands' Right-to-Die Laws.

Purchase the book or DVDDo You Call This A Life? Blurred Boundaries in the Netherlands' Right-to-Die Laws for: $20 for the book or $10 for the DVD of van Loenen's talk in Ottawa or (book and the DVD for $25) includes postage from the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition (EPC) by calling: 1-877-439-3348 or email: [email protected] 

Reprinted with permission from Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.