(LifeSiteNews) – The so-called COVID-19-pandemic is part of the masonic plan of the New World Order and is being used as an instrument of the “Great Reset.” Accordingly, the United Nations Special Envoy for Global Education, Gordon Brown, has called for the creation of a global government to cope with the coronavirus.
Catholic author Laurence England gave the appropriate response: “The One World Government is about sheer power over populaces, not about helping people. They want a world of slaves. He [Gordon Brown] was a key Bilderberg attendee.”
In fact, it was all planned long in advance. Thus, in May 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation contrived a scenario called “Lock Step” which appeared in a document entitled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” in which the world would be governed by means of “tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership” during a fictional pandemic response to which various nations emulated the extreme measures adopted by the Chinese government.
Members of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, part of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and established with funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, authored a 77-page book in October 2017 titled “The Spars Pandemic 2025–2028. A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators.” This involved “a wartime scenario of how the population should be controlled and monitored in such a crisis.”
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted the pandemic exercise “Clade X” in Washington on May 15, 2018. The primary recommendation was to produce new “vaccines” and drugs within months – not at least ten years, as has been the case in the past. Particular reference was made to recent developments in synthetic biology and self-amplifying mRNA “vaccines.”
A remarkable meeting called “Event 201” was held in New York on October 18, 2019. The stated goal was to simulate a pandemic – caused by a novel coronavirus (!). This exercise was co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The rehearsed event became reality, quickly and exactly as planned. On March 11, 2020, the WHO officially declared a “pandemic” – due to a novel coronavirus identified in and spread from Wuhan, China.
The largest donor to the WHO that year was the Gates Foundation, with a gift of $375,546,744. Bill Gates controls “global health” in that his foundation supports “Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance” (previously Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) as a founding partner with financial commitments totaling $4.100,000,000 as well as Cepi, the “Coalition for Innovation to Prevent Epidemics” (established at the WEF in 2017) with many millions in funding.
The Gates Foundation has invested $220,000,000 in the development of “vaccines” in 2020 alone. Gates himself emphasized that he supports AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, and Novavax. “The Foundation maintains other collaborations with companies such as Moderna and BioNTech.”
Also in 2020, Bilderberger Bill Gates, who is a eugenicist, abortion activist  and advocate of drastic population reduction, promoted global “vaccination” in response to the declared “pandemic.” Thereby he affirmed his intention to “vaccinate” seven billion people.
In an over-hasty rush, four “gene-based vaccines”  were at the ready. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) willingly granted “conditional marketing authorisation” to Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson. The already radically shortened studies have not been completed to this day. The companies themselves admit that they have investigated neither possible carcinogenic (carcinogenicity) nor possible DNA-altering (genotoxicity) effects.
In the relevant contracts with the European Union, “the contracting states have [even] committed themselves to bear the costs if a manufacturer has to be liable for vaccine damage.” The companies do not even have to guarantee the efficacy of their experimental Covid-injections. 
The link to abortion is particularly abhorrent. Laboratory physician and molecular biologist Prof. Dr. Paul Cullen writes that available “vaccines” use human fetal cell lines, “either directly in the production (AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson) or in the testing (BioNTech/Pfizer, Moderna)… In using such vaccines, one benefits from a ‘structure of evil’ and at least implicitly supports it.” This is also true of Novavax’s highly experimental recombinant “vaccine” with its genetically engineered spike proteins plus immune boosters.
BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna use lipid nanoparticles to introduce a blueprint in the form of synthetic mRNA into the cells of vaccinated individuals, causing them to produce the coronavirus spike protein themselves.
AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson take genetically modified viruses, so-called vectors, which contain “the gene translated into DNA for the coronavirus spike protein.” This substance is first supposed to enter the cell nucleus to be transcribed into mRNA. After that, the production of the said protein begins. The result of all four preparations is the emergence of a corresponding endogenous spike factory.
The mRNA “vaccine” (BioNTech, Moderna) imposed by the German government for the so-called “booster vaccination” is “an example for that cell and gene therapy,” as even Bayer CEO Stefan Oelrich admitted. The German Bundestag and the EU Commission specifically changed the definition of a “vaccination.” Manufacturers can now circumvent “the stricter legal regulation for gene therapeutics.”
Immunologist, toxicologist and pharmacologist Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz points out, “When I add mRNA to the organism, that is a genetic engineering experiment. […] It is and remains a human experiment, which takes place beyond ethics and morals. In my view, this vaccination is from a criminal law point of view intentional bodily harm with possible lethal sequences, I would like to emphasize this in all clarity!”
The mRNA “vaccines” do not remain in the shoulder muscle – as is often claimed. BioNTech CEO Sahin admits that they deliberately chose lipid nanoparticles that promote migration out of muscle cells into lymph nodes.
And once lipid nanoparticles are in circulation, they spread everywhere, as explained by Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer, a specialist in human biology, immunology and cell biology. Referring to Sahin, she further declares that the highly modified artificial mRNA is deliberately designed to remain stable for about two weeks and allows high amounts of spikes to be produced.
It is therefore unsurprising that a study  showed that the “spike proteins spread freely in the body of vaccinated individuals via the bloodstream.”
With the FDA's decision to officially approve the Pfizer COVID jab, calls to vaccinate schoolchildren and more university students will become louder and more insistent.
But, America's children and young people must be protected from unknown future side-effects of these drugs, and parents' rights must be respected!
Please SIGN this urgent petition which demands that COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities be prohibited in every U.S. state.
This petition will be sent to the leaders of every state legislature and to every governor in the United States, urging them to pass emergency legislation banning vaccine mandates for primary, secondary and university students.
Students simply have the right to be educated without being forced to violate deeply held principles and their own bodily integrity!
But, unfortunately, some private schools, like the Jesuit-run Brophy College Prep School in Phoenix, Arizona, have already mandated the COVID vaccine for their students, in spite of massive parental opposition. If parents or students reject the vaccine, students face intrusive weekly testing and exclusion from extra-curricular activities.
Also, more and more universities have actually started to disenroll unvaccinated students. But, even where that is not happening, not taking the vaccine often subjects students to masking, extra testing and additional administrative obstacles.
And now, with the Pfizer jab approval, Joe Biden's Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, is threatening more mandates.
While it is true that the FDA approval for the Pfizer jab only pertains to those over 16 years of age, the pharmaceutical industry and some state actors have been pushing to get approval for pre-teens!
So, it stands to reason that the Federal government will try to impose vaccines on schools, for those 16 and over, as well as on all university students. But, eventually, such mandates could even apply to younger and younger schoolchildren.
That's why state legislatures and governors must fight back against any attempt to coerce school students to take a COVID vaccine against their will!
Science and logic should dictate public health policy. And both say that mandatory vaccination for children and university students is not only unnecessary, but very likely dangerous for the future health of America's youth.
The CDC reports that the rates of death, injury, and hospitalization are very, very low for children and adolescents and that COVID transmission in schools, both from student to staff and between students, is also very low.
And a European CDC study concluded that "no evidence has been found to suggest that children or educational settings are primary drivers of COVID transmission."
So, right now, we know that schoolchildren are at very low risk of becoming very ill as a result of COVID, or of even transmitting the virus.
But, we don't know how a hastily-prepared, unstudied vaccine will affect the health of millions of America's youth in the future.
Gambling with their future, and the future of our nation, should not even be entertained for one second!
Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition urging state legislatures to ban COVID vaccine mandates for schools and universities - both public and private. Urge them to respect parents' rights, informed consent and bodily integrity.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Ivy League schools mandate COVID-19 vaccines for fall' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ivy-league-mandates-covid-19-vaccines-for-the-fall/
'FDA approval of Pfizer jab isn’t about our health, it’s about mandating the shots' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/fda-approval-of-pfizer-jab-isnt-about-our-health-its-about-mandating-the-shots
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, an internist and pneumologist, states that the distribution of the injected nanoparticles or vectors in the body apparently changes depending on the application. “The present genetic stimulation of antigen formation somewhere inside the body is a ‘backdoor attack’ and poses significant risks to a coordinated immune response.”
This expert also expressed his concern “that the strong propensity for uncontrollable cell fusions triggered by spike proteins may cause severe tissue damage and corresponding immunological and hematological consequences. Tissue destruction, microthrombosis and secondary immune complications could result in severe pathologies and death within a short period of time.”
In addition, Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist, points out with regard to COVID-injections that the number of cases of heart muscle inflammation (myocarditis) is rapidly increasing. As one of the leading experts on COVID-19, he has published 51 peer-reviewed publications on the disease. Dr. McCullough confirmed that myocarditis causes injury to heart muscle cells and can lead to permanent heart damage or to death.
Microbiologist and infectious disease epidemiologist Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi emphasizes that the effects of the COVID shots have even exceeded all his fears. “The result of this vaccination is clots, thrombi and embolisms throughout the body.” This could lead to serious consequences such as stroke and heart attack.
The “vaccine,” which is injected into the muscles, enters the bloodstream through the lymph nodes. When immune cells show the spike protein after its production on their surface, “they are attacked by their own immune cells and destroyed. As a result, immune cells perish en masse.”
According to this well-known microbiologist, this may also account for the accelerated growth of carcinomas. He notes that “each of us develops an incredible number of cancer and tumor cells in the course of our lives. For these cancer and tumor cells, we have monitoring lymphocytes whose function is to kill these tumor cells. […] If you destroy these monitoring cells, all kinds of cancer cells develop after the vaccination and preexisting ones are given free rein. […] This vaccination puts the entire immune system out of whack with a single blow.”
The number of reported cases of harm that are temporally related to the COVID injections is exploding, as a glance at the WHO databases (VigiAccess) shows. In addition, the number of unreported ones is likely to be very high. According to expert analyses and a large-scale study, it must be assumed that normally only about 3–6% of all cases are made public.
From January 1 to December 27, 2021, VigiAccess received 2,856,457 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to all Corona “vaccines.” In comparison, only 15,184 ADRs are listed for the common tetanus vaccine during the period 1968–2021.
“Other vaccines with much safer profiles have been pulled from the market in the past. For example, the Rotavirus vaccine was suspended by the US authorities in the late 1990s after 100 babies became ill, and one died – out of approximately one million doses.”
In previous attempts to develop a vaccine specifically against coronavirus, researchers have repeatedly encountered the problem of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). In this case, the antibodies do not fight the virus, but bind to it and help it enter the cells easily. In various studies on animals, the vaccinated ones became more severely ill due to the ADE effect and died faster than the unvaccinated ones. Doctors for Covid Ethics, an association of several hundred physicians and scientists, are already pointing out this dangerous phenomenon with regard to gene-based vaccines.
Against this entire backdrop, renowned pharmacologist Dr. Michael Yeadon, former head of research and a vice president at Pfizer, expresses his conviction that it is “deliberate mass murder.” “But the scandal of depriving people of effective treatments while coercing them into submission to dangerous vaccination is the worst thing that’s happened in the world for decades, arguably forever.”
Much in the same vein, an association of Holocaust survivors delivered an open letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). It states: “We, the survivors of the atrocities committed against humanity during the Second World War, feel bound to follow our conscience and write this letter. It is obvious to us that another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes. The majority of the world’s populace do not yet realize what is happening, for magnitude of an organized crime such as this is beyond their scope of experience. We, however, know.”
In Epiphania Domini 2022
Father Frank Unterhalt
 Cf. Klaus Schwab und Thierry Malleret, Covid-19: Der grosse Umbruch [Covid-19: The Great Reset], Cologny/Genf Schweiz 2020, p. 12; cf. Patrick Delaney, “Time Magazine announces ‘The Great Reset’ to usher in world socialism,” in LifeSiteNews, October 30, 2020; cf. https://time.com/collection/great-reset/, retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. Larry Elliott, “Gordon Brown calls for global government to tackle coronavirus,” in The Guardian, March 26, 2020.
 Dorothy Cummings McLean, “One world government needed to cope with Covid-19, says former British PM,” in LifeSiteNews, March 26, 2020.
 The Rockefeller Foundation, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” May, 2010, p. 18.
 Cf. ibid., p. 18–19.
 Cf. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Center for Health Security, “Center News,” January 17, 2020.
 Cf. The Rockefeller Foundation, “Public Health at Johns Hopkins,” in https://rockfound.rockarch.org/public-health-at-johns-hopkins; retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Center for Health Security, “Completed Projects. SPARS Pandemic Scenario,” October, 2017.
 Corona Transition, “«The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028»: Die heutige Pandemie – geschrieben vor fünf Jahren”[“«The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028»: The current pandemic –
written five years ago”], April 14, 2021.
 Cf. Nick Alexopulos, “Center News. Clade X pandemic exercise highlights policies needed to prevent or reduce the worst possible outcomes in future pandemics,” in Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Center for Health Security, May 15, 2018.
 Cf. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Center for Health Security, “Implications of Clade X for National Policy,” in https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/events/2018_clade_x_exercise/pdfs/Clade-X-policy-statements.pdf; retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. ibid., “The Event 201,” in https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201; retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. ibid., “The Event 201 scenario,” in https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/scenario.html;retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. ibid., “The Event 201,” op. cit.
 Cf. World Health Organization. Regional office for Europe, “Pandemie der Coronavirus-Krankheit (Covid-19)”[“Pandemic of the Coronavirus disease (Covid-19)”], in https://www.euro.who.int/de/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov; retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. World Health Organization, “Voluntary contributions by fund and by contributor, 2020,” May 7, 2021, p. 8.
 Patrick Zoll, “Ist Bill Gates der Retter der Menschheit oder ein Impfbösewicht? Warum seine Stiftung so viel Kritik erntet, obwohl sie vorgibt, Gutes zu tun” [“Is Bill Gates the savior of mankind or a vaccine villain? Why his foundation attracts so much criticism even though it claims to be doing good”], in Neue Zürcher Zeitung, September 24, 2021.
 Cf. Gavi, “The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,” in https://www.gavi.org/investing-gavi/funding/donor-profiles/bill-melinda-gates-foundation; retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. Patrick Zoll, op. cit.; cf. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, “Gates Foundation announces new funds to develop Covid-19 vaccines and increase access to affordable vaccines in low-income countries,” November 12, 2020.
 Cf. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Annual Report 2020, p. 3, in https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/documents/2020_Annual_Report.pdf; retrieved December 22, 2021.
 Cf. Martin Weiß, “Bill Gates: Auf diese 4 Corona-Impfstoff-Aktien setzt der Multimilliardär” [“Bill Gates: On these 4 Corona vaccine stock bets the multibillionaire”], in Der Aktionär, September 15, 2020.
 Cf. Michael Haynes, “A closer look at Bill Gates: promoting eugenics, friendship with Jeffrey Epstein,” in LifeSiteNews, May 19, 2021; cf. also The Epoch Times, “Bill Gates, Monsanto, Eugenik: Wie Gentechnik im Namen der „Menschlichkeit“ gefördert wird” [“How genetic engineering is promoted in the name of ‘humanity’”], July 28, 2014, updated: June 6, 2017; retrieved May 10, 2021.
 Cf. Martin Bürger, “Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population ‘widely vaccinated’,” in LifeSiteNews, April 6, 2020.
 Cf. John W. Oller et al., “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World,” Open Access Library Journal, October 27, 2017, 4: e3937, p. 8 and 11.
 Cf. Tagesthemen, “Bill Gates über Corona-Impfstoff” [“Bill Gates explains the Corona vaccine”], April 12, 2020, 4:25 min, in youtube.com/watch?v=083VjebhzgI; retrieved December 23, 2021.
 Wissenschaftliche Dienste. Deutscher Bundestag, “Regelungen zu genbasierten Impfstoffen. Begriffliche Einordnung und arzneimittelrechtliche Zulassung” [“Regulations on gene-based vaccines. Conceptual classification and drug regulatory approval”], January 25, 2021, Sachstand WD 9 – 3000 – 116/20, p. 7.
 Cf. Pfizer/BioNTech, “Comirnaty. Annex I, Summary of product characteristics,” p. 62–63, in ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/comirnaty-epar-product-information_en.pdf; retrieved January 5, 2022.
Cf. Moderna, “Spikevax. Annex I, Summary of product characteristics,” p. 17, in ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-product-information_en.pdf; retrieved January 5, 2022.
Cf. AstraZeneca, “Vaxzevria. Annex I, Summary of product characteristics,” p. 17–18, in ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vaxzevria-previously-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-epar-product-information_en.pdf; retrieved January 5, 2022.
Cf. Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, “Covid-19 Vaccine Janssen. Summary of product characteristics,” p. 24, in https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/covid-19-vaccine-janssen-epar-product-information_en.pdf; retrieved January 5, 2022.
 With the exception of Moderna on a single component: cf. Moderna, op. cit., p. 10–11.
 Cf. Pfizer/BioNTech, op. cit., p. 14; cf. Moderna, op. cit., p. 10–11; cf. AstraZeneca, op. cit., p. 11; cf. Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, op. cit., p. 15.
 Jürgen Seitz, “Impfschäden: Wer haftet und wie hoch ist der Schadenersatz?” [“Vaccine damage: who is liable and how much is the compensation?”], in BR 24, August 25, 2021.
 Cf. European Parliament, Parliamentary questions. Question for written answer E-002296/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Guido Reil (ID). Subject: Contracts with Pfizer and Moderna, April 28, 2021, in europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-002296_EN.html; retrieved January 5, 2022.
 Cf. Papst Johannes Paul II., Encyclical Sollicitudo rei socialis, 37: Of “structures of sin,” namely “that hidden behind certain decisions, apparently inspired only by economics or politics, are real forms of idolatry: of money, ideology, class, technology.”
 Prof. Dr. Paul Cullen, “Humane fetale Zelllinien bei der Impfstoff-Herstellung” [“Human fetal cell lines in vaccine production”], in Communio veritatis, October 9, 2021.
 Cf. ibid., appendix.
 Cf. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Diaserie “Corona und ‘Impfung’” [Slide series “Corona and ‘Vaccination’”], in wodarg.com/impfen/; retrieved December 23, 2021.
 Cf. Pfizer/BioNTech, op. cit., p. 2; cf. Moderna, op. cit., p. 2; cf. BioNTech, “mRNA-Impfstoffe zur Bekämpfung der Covid-19 Pandemie” [“mRNA vaccines to combat the covid-19 pandemic”], in https://biontech.de/de/covid-19-portal/mRNA-impfstoffe; retrieved December 23, 2021.
 Cf. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, “Wichtige Arzneimittelinformation” [“Important drug information”], August 23, 2021, in wodarg.com/impfen/; retrieved December 23, 2021.
 Frederik Jötten, “Wird Adenovirus-DNA ins Genom eingebaut?” [“Is adenovirus DNA incorporated into the genome?”], in Spektrum.de, February 17, 2021.
 Cf. ibid.
 Cf. Die Bundesregierung, “Alle wichtigen Informationen zur Auffrischungsimpfung” [“All important information about the booster vaccination”], in https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/coronavirus/coronavirus-auffrischungsimpfung-faq-1970900; retrieved December 27, 2021.
 Stefan Oelrich, “KEY 01 – Opening Ceremony – World Health Summit 2021,” October 24, 2021, 1:37:41 hour, in youtube.com/watch?v=OJFKBritLlc&t=5844s; retrieved December 23, 2021.
 Cf. Deutscher Bundestag, “Beschlussempfehlung und Bericht des Ausschusses für Gesundheit (14. Ausschuss). Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung arzneimittelrechtlicher und anderer Vorschriften” [“Resolution recommendation and report of the Committee on Health (14. committee). Draft law amending pharmaceutical legislation and other regulations”], Drucksache 16/13428, June 17, 2009, p. 9 and 83; cf. Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union, “Richtlinien. Richtlinie 2009/120/EG der Kommission” [“Guidelines. Guideline 2009/120/EG of the committee”], September 14, 2009, L 242/4, 2.1.
 Paul Schreyer, “Faktencheck: Sind die mRNA-Injektionen Impfungen oder Gentherapie?” [“Fact-check: Are the mRNA injections vaccinations or gene therapy?”], in Multipolar, December 3, 2021.
 Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz, “«Das ist keine Impfung sondern eine prophylaktische Gen-Therapie»” [“«This is not a vaccination but a prophylactic gene therapy»”], in Basel Express, Edition April 2021.
 Cf. Wiener Zeitung, “Teil von Covid-19-Vakzine könnte aus Österreich kommen” [“Part of Covid 19 vaccine could come from Austria”], September 2, 2020; cf. Ärzteblatt.de, “Biontech: Nanopartikel sind schwieriger herzustellen als mRNA” [“Biontech: Nanoparticles are more difficult to produce than mRNA”], March 4, 2021.
 Cf. Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer, Vortrag am 10. Dezember 2021 beim Corona-Ausschuss, 82. Sitzung “Es gibt kein kostenloses Mittagsessen” [“There is no free lunch”], 4:33 hour; cf. European Medicines Agency, “Assessment report. Comirnaty,” EMA/707383/2020 Corr.1, February 19, 2021, p. 47.
 Cf. Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer, op. cit., 4:42–4:50 hour; cf. BioNTech, “Why mRNA represents a disruptive new drug class. Nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA),” in https://biontech.de/how-we-translate/mrna-therapeutics; retrieved December 22, 2021; cf. Ugur Sahin, Katalin Karikó, Özlem Türeci, “mRNA-based therapeutics – devolping a new class of drugs,” in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, September 19, 2014, 13, 759–780 (2014), doi: 10.1038/nrd4278.
 Cf. Alana F. Ogata et al., “Circulating Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 20, 2021, XX(XX):1–4, doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab465.
 Corona Transition, “Neue Studie weist Spike-Proteine im Blutplasma von Geimpften nach” [“New study detects spike proteins in blood plasma of vaccinated individuals”] June 25, 2021.
 Cf. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, “Wichtige Arzneimittelinformation” [“Important drug information”], op. cit.
 Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, “Wurde vom Paul-Ehrlich-Institut eine gefährliche Nebenwirkung der Impfung ausgeblendet?” [“Was a dangerous side effect of vaccination omitted by the Paul Ehrlich Institute?”], in Multipolar, February 21, 2021.
 Cf. Dr. Peter McCullough, “Dr. McCullough: 10 Reasons to drop vaccine support or mandates,” in LifeSiteNews, August 2, 2021.
 Cf. Patrick Delaney, “Dr. Peter McCullough: The Covid shot is a form of ‘bioterrorism,’ its spike protein is ‘pathogenic’,” in LifeSiteNews, November 9, 2021.
 Cf. Dr. Peter McCullough, op. cit.
 Edith Brötzner, “Prof. Bhakdi erläutert Hintergründe: Covid-Impfung und beschleunigtes Krebswachstum” [“Prof. Bhakdi explains the background: Covid vaccinations and accelerated cancer growth”], in Report 24, October 14, 2021.
 Cf. Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, “The Covid vaccines were designed to fail (Nov. 25th 2021),” in doctors4covidethics.org, November 27, 2021.
 Edith Brötzner, op. cit.
 Cf. Lorna Hazell und Saad A.W. Shakir, “Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions. A Systematic Review,”Drug-Safety 29, 385–396 (2006), November 20, 2012, in https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003; retrieved December 22, 2012; cf. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, “Schaden größer als Nutzen-weshalb tun sie das?” [“Harm greater than benefit – why do they do it?”], in wodarg.com, April 2, 2020.
 Cf. VigiAccess, “Covid-19 vaccine,” in vigiaccess.org; retrieved December 27, 2021.
 Cf. ibid., “Tetanus vaccine,” in vigiaccess.org; retrieved December 27, 2021.
 America’s Frontline Doctors, “10 Key Facts That Threaten The Covid Narrative,” Fact 9, in https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/covid/covid-facts/; retrieved December 27, 2021
 Cf. Johannes Dieffenbach, “Neue Peer-Review-Studie bestätigt: Corona-Impfungen könnten zu Massensterben führen” [“New peer review study confirms: Corona vaccinations could lead to mass deaths”], in The Epoch Times, August 23, 2021, updated: August 25, 2021.
 Cf. Chien-Te Tseng et al., “Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus,” April 20, 2012, PLoS One 7(4): e35421, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035421.
Cf. Tomomi Takano et al., “Pathogenesis of oral type I feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) infection: Antibody-dependent enhancement infection of cats with type I FIPV via the oral route,” The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, April 23, 2019, 81(6): 911–915, doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0702.
 Cf. Doctors for Covid Ethics, “Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding Covid-19 Immunity and Vaccines – Implications for Safety and Efficacy,” in Doctors for Covid Ethics, July 9, 2021.
 Mordechai Sones, “Former Pfizer VP: ‘Clear evidence of fraud’ in Pfizer study claiming 95% efficacy,” in America’s Frontline Doctors, September 30, 2021.
 Doctors for Covid Ethics, “Holocaust Survivors Write to the European Medicines Agency,” in Doctors for Covid Ethics, August 26, 2021; cf. also We for Humanity, Letter to the European Medicines Agency, August 25, 2021, in https://we-for-humanity.org/en/en-ema-letter/; retrieved December 22, 2021.