Opinion
Featured Image

Paul Elias Alexander, PhD, has expertise in the teaching of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine; former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C. (2020); and a former senior advisor on COVID pandemic policy at the U.S. government’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Washington, D.C. He did graduate studies at the University of Oxford in England, the University of Toronto in Canada, McMaster University in Canada, and York University in Canada. He is currently an independent academic scientist and consultant.

(LifeSiteNews) – For something to be a vaccine, several criteria must be met:

  • the injection must provide the recipient antibody immunity to a pathogen (virus or bacterium)
  • the antibodies produced post-injection must be shown to confer protection from that virus or bacterium
  • the injection must demonstrate it reduces hospitalizations or deaths from the pathogen
  • the injection must demonstrate it reduces severe symptoms of the pathogen
  • the injection must demonstrate it stops the recipient from carrying the pathogen
  • the injection must show it stops transmission of the pathogen from the injection recipient to others

Let us examine these criteria further to discuss if they have been met in the case of the coronavirus “vaccine”:

  • We have found now that the injection does not confer antibody immunity to the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2); it promotes antibodies to the “synthetic spike protein” that your cells have built. That spike protein is not specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
  • The antibodies produced have to give you protection from the pathogen (SARS-CoV-2 virus); this has not been shown in any study to do this. The vaccine developers have stated openly that they do not know if the injection will give protection.
  • The injection was not studied to show that it reduces hospitalizations or deaths; the studies conducted did not assess this.
  • The injection was not studied to show that it reduces severe symptoms.
  • The injection was not studied to show that it stops recipients from carrying the pathogen.
  • The injection was not studied to show that it stops transmission from one person to others.

The conclusion, therefore, is no. This injection for COVID-19 is not a vaccine; it is best described as a gene delivery platform.

The studies conducted by the injection developers were not set up to show any of the above six mentioned criterion; these injections for COVID-19 do not prevent transmission and were not designed to do this. We were told that the injection developers are measuring to see if the injection “attenuates” symptoms.

We even have clear evidence from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which reported on an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infections, including COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections, associated with large public gatherings in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, in July 2021: “469 COVID-19 cases were identified among Massachusetts residents who had traveled to the town during July 3–17; 346 (74%) occurred in fully vaccinated persons. Testing identified the Delta variant in 90% of specimens from 133 patients. Cycle threshold values were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated and those who were not” (emphasis added).

Gazit’s Israeli study (reported on August 25, 2021) may be the nail in the coffin for it shows that “natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.” The findings suggest that natural infection contributes to far greater immunity than the injection.

Adding to this, an August 10, 2021 LANCET journal publication by Chau et al. looking at transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among vaccinated healthcare workers in Vietnam, further ransacks the COVID-19 injection landscape and throws it into turmoil in terms of disastrous findings. Sixty-nine healthcare workers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 62 participated in the clinical study. Researchers reported “23 complete-genome sequences were obtained. They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers. Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”

The British Public Health System, Public Health England (PHE), in its latest iteration of the spread and analysis of the “Delta variant” (report 21), throws this injection into more disarray by showing that approximately 60% of the deaths post-Delta variant infection occurred in double-vaccinated persons.

We even have reports now that those who received the third booster shot in Israel have become infected. The injections are not working and some even argue haven’t worked since their inception.

And Gibraltar and Iceland have had 90% of their populations injected, yet have experienced explosive rises in COVID-19 infections.

These findings raise very urgent and serious questions for the injection developers and clearly show that the injections have failed.

The authorities involved in the COVID-19 injection development even stated that it “may reduce symptoms”; there is no mention that it will stop you from dying from the infection or stop severe symptoms. It was never meant to protect you.

When the media and lead public health officials make these statements, they are being duplicitous and deceitful. The studies post-injection roll-out, that appear to suggest that the shot reduces (stops) transmission are sub-optimal and potentially misleading.

I argue that the RT-PCR test was likely manipulated and adjusted to reduce the cycle count thresholds (Ct) to provide a negative test as needed to show that the injection is working; the Ct can be adjusted during an emergency to an elevated threshold to drive infection counts (most likely false-positive, 90-100%) to “show” that the pandemic is worsening, and then it can be reduced and look like infections are down.

We don’t know what happens after the lipid nano-particles (LNP) and RNA (mRNA) enter the cells/body

We have no evidence that any of the six criteria that make a vaccine are met.

This is not a vaccine and has not been proven to be one, and

No amount of wishing or hoping the COVID-19 injection is a vaccine can make it one.

Moreover, these injections were sub-optimally studied, particularly when it coms to safety.

We do not have proper duration data to show the safety; we have not “excluded harms” with these injection studies. We have no safety profiles.

Our children must never be injected with these, as we do not know what will happen medium- and long-term. These injections are not needed given our children’s near-statistical zero risk of infection, of transmitting the virus, and severe outcome if infected.

You must understand, mRNA technology has never been successfully utilized to show its capacity to reduce the incidence of infectious diseases in human beings, ever! We have no history of this. We do not know what takes place after the lipid nano-particles (LNP) and messenger RNA (mRNA) enter the cells/body. We do not know if the mRNA is “turned off” and spike protein is no longer produced. We do not know where the spike protein goes after being produced and for how long.

The appropriate reproductive toxicity studies, the teratogenicity studies, the pharmacodynamic studies, and the pharmacokinetic studies were not done. The spike protein on the viral ball is the portion of the virus that causes the devastating trauma and illness from severe COVID-19. This spike protein is what kills you and devastates your vasculature, ravaging the endothelial layer of the vasculature. End-stage severe COVID-19 illness is a blood clotting vascular illness. You do not die when your lungs fail in end-stage COVID-19 because there is virus in the lungs. No, you die because of the millions of micro-thrombi (blood clots). The spike protein that our cells produce post injection (though not exactly like the authentic spike protein on the viral ball), is pathogenic and toxic.

It is deadly.

So why would we inject something that causes severe illness (damages our vasculature) if infected, now as part of an effort to inoculate/inject to prevent the severe illness?

This makes absolutely no sense.

Why did the “vaccine” developers use the spike as the target for the immune response when it confers a very narrow “spike-specific” immunity with a very immature immunity library?

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to mandatory vaccination for the coronavirus
  Show Petition Text
1069878 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 1100000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

People of goodwill can disagree about the safety, efficacy and religious implications of a new vaccine for the coronavirus.

But, everyone should agree on this point:

No government can force anyone who has reached legal adulthood to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. Equally, no government can vaccinate minors for the coronavirus against the will of their parents or guardians.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which urges policymakers at every level of government to reject calls for mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

Fear of a disease - which we know very little about, relative to other similar diseases - must not lead to knee-jerk reactions regarding public health, nor can it justify supporting the hidden agenda of governmental as well as non-governmental bodies that have apparent conflicts of interest in plans to restrict personal freedoms. 

The so-called "public health experts" have gotten it wrong many times during the current crisis. We should not, therefore, allow their opinions to rush decision-makers into policies regarding vaccination.

And, while some people, like Bill Gates, may have a lot of money, his opinion and that of his NGO (the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) - namely, that life will not return to normal till people are widely vaccinated - should not be permitted to influence policy decisions on a coronavirus vaccination program.

Finally, we must also not allow the rush by pharmaceutical companies to produce a new coronavirus vaccine to, itself, become an imperative for vaccination.

Unwitting citizens must not be used as guinea pigs for New World Order ideologues, or Big Pharma, in pursuit of a vaccine (and, profits) which may not even protect against future mutated strains of the coronavirus.

And it goes without saying that the production of vaccines using aborted babies for cell replication is a total non-starter, as the technique is gravely immoral.

However, if after sufficient study of the issue, a person who has reached the age of majority wishes to be vaccinated with a morally produced vaccine, along with his children, that is his business.

But we cannot and will not permit the government to make that decision for us.

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, urging policymakers at all levels of government to reject mandatory coronavirus vaccination.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Bill Gates: Life won’t go back to ‘normal’ until population 'widely vaccinated' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bill-gates-life-wont-go-back-to-normal-until-population-widely-vaccinated

COVID-19 scare leads to more digital surveillance, talk of mandatory vaccine 'tattoos' for kids' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covid-19-scare-leads-to-more-digital-surveillance-talk-of-mandatory-vaccine-tattoos-for-kids

Trudeau says no return to ‘normal’ without vaccine: 'Could take 12 to 18 months' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-says-no-return-to-normal-without-vaccine-could-take-12-to-18-months

Trudeau mulls making coronavirus vaccine mandatory for Canadians - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trudeau-mulls-making-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-for-canadians

US bishop vows to ‘refuse’ COVID-19 vaccine if made from ‘aborted fetal tissue' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishop-vows-to-refuse-covid-19-vaccine-if-made-from-aborted-fetal-tissue

** While LifeSite opposes immorally-produced vaccines using aborted fetal cell lines, we do not have a position on any particular coronavirus vaccines produced without such moral problems. We realize many have general concerns about vaccines, but also recognize that millions of lives have been saved due to vaccines.

*** Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

A vaccine was never needed for this emergency, and the injections that were produced have now shown themselves to be failing with double-injected persons becoming infected with the Delta variant, with severe adverse effects and even death. This injection program must be stopped so that we can understand why these harms and deaths have accrued.

Any injection program must only be targeted to the highest-risk persons where the risk-benefit calculation skews the decision toward the injection; this injection is completely contra-indicated for children and essentially for all persons under 70 years of age who are not at risk.

Ideally, the injection program must be stopped entirely given what we are seeing.

 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.