Opinion
Featured Image
Pro-abortion activists demonstrate in front of the U.S. Supreme Court Building on June 13, 2022, in Washington, D.C.Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

(LifeSiteNews) – If the U.S. Supreme Court bumps America’s abortion law-making back to the states, as it should, the conventional wisdom holds that the pro-life side wins.

But think again. The fight for the life of unborn babies doesn’t end with the possible demise of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that declared abortion to be a right. Instead, a critically new stage begins.

Instead of fighting it out before the high court, the struggle would balloon to as many as 50 battlefields in each and every state. That’s not all: in each state there are three branches of government — the executive, legislative and judicial –– where the pro-life agenda can be strangled.

It could get messy—as democracy surely can. The better-funded pro-abortion brigades will contest, as they always do, every commonsense restriction, such as requiring a minor to tell her parents that she’s getting an abortion. Expect that they will try to enact their most extreme demand: elective abortions up to and through the moment of birth, or even apply this astonishing assertion by ethicist Peter Singer ­– that for twenty-eight days after birth, it’s morally acceptable in certain circumstances to kill a child.

That’s why it’s doubly important for pro-life advocates to ensure the integrity of state and local elections.

READ: Pro-abortion activist indicted for attempted murder of Justice Kavanaugh

The challenge for the pro-life movement is to corral the people, money, resources and, most of all, the energy to take this contest to every corner of America. Especially understanding that pro-abortion organizations, like Planned Parenthood, can raise vast sums — double, triple and perhaps even more — than pro-life forces can. The challenge, now ever more critical, is to protect established voting laws and procedures that progressives routinely challenge. The fight will require heroic efforts.

We’ve already seen how pro-abortion organizations have exploited elections to their benefit. They’ve pushed mercilessly for mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, unguarded absentee ballot drop boxes and more, breaking chains of custody. Voter identification? Poof, out the window.

I’ve seen it all firsthand, as an attorney exposing the gamesmanship of the 2020 election in multiple states. Don’t even begin to think that the abortion industry won’t deploy the same, well-funded tactics to legalize the “termination” of the most innocent and unprotected lives. Well-financed Planned Parenthood wasted no time in suing Lubbock, Texas, after voters in a referendum election outlawed abortion within the city, 62 percent to 38 percent. A judge dismissed the lawsuit.

Consider how governors and the executive branch, who have a constitutional obligation to enforce the laws, can stymie unborn babies’ protections, sitting on their hands, refusing to enforce pro-life laws. For example, in 1995, Illinois enacted popular legislation requiring that a pregnant girl under 18 notify a parent or guardian before having an abortion—an invasive and serious surgical procedure. Parental consent was not required, insisted abortion supporters, making it a weaker law.

Lawsuits were filed, one claiming a provision of the act was unconstitutional. What followed was an astonishing nineyears of judicial hearings, injunctions and appeals. For nine years an enacted law was not enforced, as if it never was on the books. Finally, with the aid of the Thomas More Society, the Illinois Supreme Court gave the law a green light. But the light turned red late last year, when a Democrat majority in the state legislature repealed the law.

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell Dave Rubin: Aborting disabled babies is cruel.
  Show Petition Text
6313 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Dave Rubin (left) hosts one of the most popular conservative chat-shows on YouTube, but we now know his views are as extreme as many on the left.

Not only are Rubin and his homosexual partner using surrogate mothers to bear two babies, thus deliberately depriving the children of their true mothers' care once born, but he also admitted those babies would have been aborted if found to have severe disabilities. 

SIGN the petition telling Dave Rubin that true conservatives protect life and uphold the right of children to be raised by their mothers.

Mr. Rubin recently said he also supports abortion up until 12 weeks, compounding the regrettable pro-eugenics stance he has taken towards unborn babies with severe disabilities. 

There are few things more tragic in our world today than the disposable attitude of many people towards innocent human life, but that is exactly what Rubin thinks is acceptable.

This must be called out - it's simply abhorrent to treat the disabled, the unwanted, and the vulnerable with such callous disregard. 

Tell Dave Rubin that his pro-eugenics views have no place in a humane society.

Can you imagine finding out your parents would have aborted you if you had a severe disability? 

Well, that's unfortunately what will happen to the children Rubin raises if they someday read his latest book, "Don't Burn This Country".

There he shares that he and his family's decision would have been to "terminate the pregnancy" if a severe disability was found in one of the babies now being borne by their surrogate mothers. 

Rubin must understand how cruel this entire situation is, not only for the mothers and their children who will be taken away, but also for disabled people to know they are essentially thought of as "lives unworthy of life."

Real conservatives must speak up now and tell Rubin that his pro-abortion views are abhorrent.

Mr. Rubin's public split with the left is to be welcomed, but "conservative" leaders like him will do much more harm than good if they continue using their platform to undermine the family and the right of children to be born.

If we let these cornerstones of society be attacked from within, what hope have we of building a culture we can be proud to hand on?

Make a stand today for unborn children and their mothers - tell Dave Rubin that he's wrong.

True conservatives cannot afford to take the easy shortcut of ignoring Rubin's cruel position, lest we continue to be shunted further left, becoming radical liberals in everything but name.

So, please SIGN and SHARE this petition today,

MORE INFORMATION:

Why are leading conservatives congratulating Dave Rubin and his 'husband'? - LifeSiteNews

Dave Rubin says he'd ask his surrogate to abort any disabled child - The Bridgehead

**Main Image: YouTube screenshot of Dave Rubin talking to Donald Trump Jr.**

  Hide Petition Text

Similar stalling and destructive possibilities are endless, and are as varied as each state. If a constitutional amendment is required to protect life in a state, the question might be put to voters in a referendum. But a pro-life ballot question, crafted by an abortion-supporting secretary of state, could be rigged. For example, it could be worded in such a confusing manner as to turn a “yes” vote into a “no.” Assuming, of course, that enough signatures on the petition drive calling for a referendum were left, without being tossed out for minor technicalities – or no technicalities at all – by a partisan election commission.

None of this is unheard of. In multiple states, for example, I represented plaintiffs in pre-2020 election lawsuits asserting that “Zuckerbucks” privatized certain elections with a liberal billionaire’s money. To wit, the leftwing Center for Tech and Civic Life, pumped millions into effort, thanks to donations by woke Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan. The privately funded efforts included legally unauthorized absentee ballot drop boxes in Wisconsin.

The result has been 21 states banning or regulating Zuckerbucks since the 2020 election. There would be more except pro-abortion Governors in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin have vetoed legislation banning Zuckerbucks.

READ: Unity on display at Supreme Court when pro-lifers gather to await Dobbs decision

Every abortion “restriction” in every state can expect judicial, administrative and legislative attacks by the multi-billion-dollar abortion industry and their pawns, like the ACLU. Waiting periods, parental consent and “heartbeat” provisions will be targeted. You can be certain that the 13 states that have enacted pro-life laws to take effect after Roe is overturned will be energetically targeted

Other states have passed laws preserving Roe. Illinois, for example, passed the deceptively labeled Reproductive Health Act, echoing the most extreme pro-abortion agenda: Elective abortion at any time for any reason. Ironically, even the Roe justices might have found this law to be unconstitutional.

It is now incumbent for pro-life fighters to become experts in their state election laws and constitutions and their political party’s workings. They must identify influential allies and like-minded life advocates. They will have to get to know the ins and outs of complex election procedures, cultivate media contacts and more. They will need to hone not one, but multiple ways, to influence the election process, raise money, and organize “boots on the ground.”

This new environment will seriously test our commitment to life. If you are not already studying and strategizing about how to succeed, you are already dangerously behind.

Erick Kaardal is a Minnesota attorney who concentrates in election law and is special counsel with the Thomas More Society.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...