Opinion
Featured Image
Bill Gates.lev radin / Shutterstock.com

January 14, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Some have probably heard of the psychological theory known as “projection.” Most of the online descriptions of the theory are overly complicated and irrelevant to the point being made here, so they will not be cited. But there is a specific type of projection — call it simply an observable phenomenon rather than a psychological theory — that one can identify without any experience in psychology. Some people have the tendency to project their own good principles onto others when they have an obligation not to project those good principles. The phenomenon is often verbally expressed in the following ways: “nobody would really do that” or “nobody could really be that evil.”    

A cursory study of the history of certain political entities, even within the last 10 years, makes one conclude, “yes, they can” be that evil. Specific examples are unnecessary, but many of the evils involve people or entities using other human beings to gain power and to destroy others who get in their way. It is obvious that many people in the world have an extremely distorted and incorrect idea of what is “noble” and good. The draconian responses by public health officials and governing entities in America to the reported COVID-19 pandemic suggest that many people “would really do that.”

It is an unfortunate reality that many people in the world have anti-life and other distorted views that could influence how they use their power and positions in government. The views of those involved with the provision of COVID-19 data and information and COVID-19 vaccines are relevant.

A previous article discussing the Moderna/U.S. federal government COVID-19 vaccine and the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine mentioned that some found Bill Gates’s public appearances early in the COVID-19 panic odd. The article mentioned that, at the same time he was causing COVID-19 fear, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was involved in developing a COVID-19 vaccine with Moderna and the U.S. federal government.

Moderna, which is apparently known for its secrecy, “has nearly 100 projects going at once,” but none of those has been proven safe and effective for marketing in the U.S. One has to ask, why not? Is it because they actually already know that the mRNA technology is not safe?

If companies discover early in the development of a drug or vaccine that the drug or vaccine is unsafe in animals or humans, they are not necessarily required to publish the information. So when a company has had hundreds of projects, some or many of which have failed, and did not publish the data, one may reasonably suspect that the products were discovered to be harmful.

Specifically, the COVID-19 vaccine technologies have not been shown to be safe in the long term. They reportedly work by forcing the body to make things it does not normally make. Serious short-term harms have already been discovered but wrongly downplayed. Harms discovered after more than a few months, including cancers, cannot be excluded. But that is a bit of a tangent from the main topic of this article.

Since writing the previous article, it has been determined that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is also at least indirectly involved with the development of the other COVID-19 vaccine authorized (but not approved) in the U.S. This particular vaccine is sometimes incorrectly labeled as “the Pfizer vaccine.” The vaccine itself was actually developed by a foreign company named “BioNTech,” which then partnered with Pfizer.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Dump YouTube, Twitter and Big Tech for threatening our democracy and freedom of speech!
  Show Petition Text
75308 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 80000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

PETITION UPDATE (2/23/21) - 

LifeSite has signed on to a Media Research Center (MRC) letter to all 50 state Attorneys General, calling for an investigation into Big Tech.

Google, Facebook, and Twitter have monopolized the industry, and are using their influence to collect user data, suppress content, and silence those who voice ideas and beliefs counter to their own.

As we urged prior, action must be taken to combat these efforts, and that is why we’ve joined the MRC in this fight.

Please take a couple of minutes to READ this LifeSiteNews article about MRC's initiative: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesite-joins-effort-asking-state-attorneys-general-to-investigate-big-tech-for-deceptive-trade-practices

Then, please SIGN and STOP using Twitter, Facebook, Google (YouTube) and Amazon to take back your privacy and freedom of speech!

________________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (2/9/21) -

YouTube just completely removed the LifeSiteNews YouTube channel. This isn’t a ban, every single one of our videos is completely gone. Being completely removed from YouTube means we’ve lost access to 300,000+ followers.

This is the latest and appalling affront to free speech which is happening to many conservative and Christian organizations.

Please SIGN this petition and STOP using YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Google (owner of YouTube) and Amazon to take back your privacy and freedom of speech!

We are not going to take this lying down!

Thankfully, we have backups of all our videos:

You can watch our current videos on Rumble, here: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNews
Or on our LifeSiteNews Catholic Rumble channel, here: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNewsCatholic

You can also sign-up to receive email alerts about our recent videos here: https://bit.ly/LifeSiteVideoSub

Please help us build Rumble and our other alternative platforms by donating through our secure link: https://give.lifesitenews.com/

After you SIGN this petition, please also see our 'Goodbye Google' resources to find out how to quit Big Tech and learn more about good alternatives!

____________________________________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (1/26/20) -

Twitter has again locked LifeSiteNews out of two of our accounts on the platform for displaying a message noting that President Joe Biden’s newly named Assistant Secretary of Health “Rachel” Levine is a man.

Both accounts displayed a simple message which read: “Biden names transgender ‘woman’ as Assistant Secretary of Health. ‘Rachel’ Levine is a father of two who divorced his wife in 2013 after 30 years of marriage.” The tweets also included a link to LifeSite’s article Biden names transgender ‘woman’ as Assistant Secretary of Health, and contained part of the opening sentence of that article, “Joe Biden has announced his intention to appoint a gender-confused man” as Assistant Secretary of Health.

For stating biological or Biblical truths, Twitter and Big Tech are trying to shut down conservative voices.

Therefore, it is now more important than ever to consider dumping Twitter, Google (who own YouTube) and Facebook. To be clear: LifeSite is still using Twitter and Big Tech to encourage others to migrate away from these illiberal platforms.

This is not the first time that LifeSiteNews has been censored by Twitter. In December 2019, Twitter indefinitely suspended our account for a tweet that linked to an article on transgender activist Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv.

At the time, Twitter gave LifeSite the option to delete the tweet and reactivate our account right away. LifeSite remained steadfast that the tweet did not violate any of the company’s “rules and policies,” and sought several appeals with Twitter, while looking into legal action against the company.

And, while LifeSite's account was eventually restored, we must now consider what course of action we will pursue in this case, over and above appealing the ban.

Meanwhile, since taking office on Wednesday last week, Joe Biden has already signed an executive order which will force women’s athletic programs, restrooms, and locker rooms to be open to men. He has also turned back the Trump administration’s policy protecting women’s sports programs in schools.

Last week, LifeSite was banned for two weeks from our YouTube channel, after the site determined that one of our videos about vaccines violated YouTube’s “community guidelines.” We are also in the middle of appealing this ban.

Please considering SIGNING and SHARING this petition. Thank you!

__________________________________________________________________________

Twitter just deplatformed President Trump premanently! And, other conservatives, including General Flynn and Sidney Powell, were also summarily deplatformed.

Conservatives, Christians and freedom-loving Americans of all political persuasions must now take a decision to preserve their free speech AND their ability to peaceably assemble by dumping Twitter and Big Tech, and by finding other good alternatives to communicate with each other and share their opinions.

Please SIGN our petition-pledge to Dump Twitter and Big Tech, and take back your freedom of speech and privacy. [CLICK HERE for our "Goodbye Google" resources page to find good alternatives to Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and Google!]

When you use Twitter or Facebook to communicate, and, or, Google and Amazon to search for something online, these companies can stifle your ability to share your thoughts and opinions and manipulate your search results, threatening your privacy, your freedom of speech, and even our democracy.

Evidence suggests that Twitter and Facebook's 'community guidelines' are selectively enforced against conservatives and Christians, while Google rigs their search algorithms to direct traffic away from conservative and Christian websites, effectively choking traffic to those sites.

Simply put, Twitter, Facebook, Google (who owns YouTube) and Amazon appear to be actively suppressing access to pro-freedom, pro-family and pro-life news and opinion.

Don't contribute to this assault on democracy: Stop using Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon as your default social media platforms and search engine! [CLICK HERE to find a good alternative to Google.]

To repeat: a few liberal and completely unaccountable computer programmers in Silicon Valley are dictating what we do and do not see in our Twitter and Facebook feeds, and in our Google searches.

We, here, at LifeSite, also recently had our Twitter account suspended by the company over "misgendering" a man who claims to be a woman.

LifeSite has also experienced a fall-off in Google search-related traffic since the company updated its search algorithms at the beginning of May.

And, since the November election, Twitter and Big Tech appear to have dramatically INCREASED their censorship of conservatives and Christians as the President Trump disputed the results of the election and when evidence of election fraud began to mount.

Now, it seems likely that they are trying to cut-off conservative leaders (like President Trump) from conservatives on the ground, and effectively exclude us from the national conversation.

But, this tactic will not work. Because Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon are not the only game in town! There are a good number of excellent alternatives which we list in our 'Goodbye Google' Resources page.

The great irony is that, while Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon executives talk a lot about maintaining freedom of speech and diversity, in fact, these hypocrites are ATTACKING free speech point-blank!

This kind of manipulation poses a lethal threat to our democracy, but as we see so clearly now, Twitter and Big Tech have shown no hesitation in excluding conservatives and Christians from the public square.

So, at this point, the only way to stop Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon is to quit using their platform.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to pledge to stop using Twitter and Big Tech. Then, please CLICK HERE to find alternative search engines and social media platforms. Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Follow LifeSiteNews on these alternative channels:

Telegram: https://t.me/lifesitetelegram

Gab: https://gab.com/LifeSiteNews

MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/lifesitenewscom1

Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNews

Parler: parler.com/profile/lifesitenews (currently down due to Amazon removing their web hosting)

Ready to say "Goodbye Google"? Find alternatives for search engines, browsers, email, and morehttps://lifefacts.lifesitenews.com/goodbye-google/resources/

'BREAKING: Twitter permanently bans President Trump from platform'https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-twitter-permanently-bans-president-trump-from-platform

WATCH LifeSite's exclusive series - 'Big Tech vs Free Speech' - of interviews with experts on how Big Tech censorship is killing free speechhttps://www.lifesitenews.com/bigtech/

From YouTube to social media and beyond, online censorship is rampant. Read the latest articles covering this ongoing struggle: https://lifefacts.lifesitenews.com/goodbye-google/censorship/

  Hide Petition Text

BioNTech was founded by Dr. Ugur Sahin, a Turkish immigrant to Germany, and his wife Ozlem Tureci. Dr. Sahin was awarded “a prize for Muslims in science and technology” in 2019, but the company itself apparently has been in existence since 2008 and still does not have any products proven to be safe and effective on the market. It is definitely worth keeping in mind that both companies with COVID-19 vaccines that were given “emergency use authorization” in the U.S. — and liability immunity — have zero approved products on the market.

With no products on the market, BioNTech had its initial public offering on the U.S. stock market in 2019. Also in 2019, only a few months before the reported discovery of COVID-19, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation purchased $55 million’s worth of BioNTech stock. Since its initial public offering, the stock had increased by as much as roughly 800% in December 2020. And BioNTech currently partners with the Chinese company Fosun Pharma.

So, notably, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation could apparently gain off both COVID-19 vaccines authorized (but not approved) in the U.S.

There is another reason why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s involvement in the COVID-19 vaccines is worth noting. Before getting to that, though, consider this: would you want to know if the government entities promoting vaccine use, the vaccine-maker, or a powerful person investing in the vaccine supports population reduction? There are many liberals who consider population bad. Say, as some have said in the past, a government entity considered future population growth (and therefore large families) “a threat to national security” for whatever false reason such governing entities can make up. Say also that the same governing persons are involved with developing and authorizing a vaccine. Would a reasonable person consider that information necessary prior to deciding to refuse or receive the vaccine?

Or put it this way: is a vaccine-maker’s, vaccine-authorizer’s, or a vaccine-funder’s stance on human life — and population control, which, it has to be mentioned, could involve deceptive and intentional reduction in life expectancy or infertility, which are contrary to human life — relevant to your decision to receive or refuse the vaccine? Even the most liberal liberal who supports the grave evil of population reduction would seemingly agree that informed consent requires one to know that a vaccine was paid for, made by, or authorized by persons who support population reduction and control.

Those who support something as evil as population control probably will not tell the world when they are putting their views into action; if they support something as evil as population control, they might also support using deception and falsehoods to make that evil a reality. It is probably unreasonable to think such persons would say, “Well, folks in America and the rest of the world, we are going to do some population control here. Don’t worry, though — it is rigorously tested and even safe and effective.” So, it would definitely be noteworthy if such persons clearly express such views and are involved with vaccines.

It is pertinent — not “conspiracy theory,” as some have wrongly stated — to know that Mr. Gates, who has been heavily involved in both COVID-19 vaccines given emergency use authorization, has supported population reduction and control. In 2010, he said the following:

First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. (transcript at 04:21)

There are more than one significant point to be made about that statement. Additionally, it is not clear how his statement, and the obvious conclusions one would make from his statement in support of population reduction (and his involvement in COVID-19 vaccines) is considered a “conspiracy theory.” There is no theory there; he really said those words.

Generally speaking, it is clear that Mr. Gates supports COVID-19 vaccines — he reportedly is on a “quest to vaccinate the world” with COVID-19 vaccines. It is odd that such a person almost completely overlooks the fact that many people do not need vaccination, and many people do not even experience symptoms from SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the normal person might say, “Speak for yourself, sir” on COVID-19 vaccines. (The suggestion that “the only way to get things back to normal is through COVID-19 vaccines” is false, but that will not be elaborated here.)

Back to Mr. Gates’s clearly thinking it is a good and noble thing to reduce the world’s population, stating, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower [the world’s future population] by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” There are only a few conclusions one can arrive at from such a statement combined with his involvement with COVID-19 vaccines.

Of course, “nobody would really do that,” would he?

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.