Opinion
Featured Image
Chinese President Xi Jinping (right) shakes hands with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to the G20 Summit on September 4, 2016 in Hangzhou, China. Lintao Zhang/Getty Images

(JCCF) – Human rights violations by China’s Communist regime are well known. Those who dissent peacefully against Communist Party rule — or even against unjust laws — can find themselves persecuted and imprisoned.

The regime harvests the organs of Falun Gong practitioners who have been sentenced to death, creating a booming transplant trade that is worth about $1 billion a year. Chinese websites have advertised hearts, lungs, and kidneys for sale and available to book in advance, suggesting that the victims are killed on demand.

Since 2017, more than one million Uyghurs and other Muslims have been arbitrarily detained in internment camps. Documented human rights abuses include forced abortions, forced sterilizations, forced labor, torture, physical and sexual abuse, mass surveillance, family separation, and repression of cultural and religious expression.

In addition to these ruthless jackboot tactics, Chinese socialism also inflicts soft totalitarianism on citizens through a “social credit” system by which government monitors the whereabouts, activities, and behaviours of the Chinese.

Citizens with a low social credit score will find themselves banned from boarding trains and airplanes, excluded from better schools, prevented from patronizing hotels or restaurants, and in some cases registered on a public blacklist for all to see.

Meanwhile, Chinese with a high social credit score will be rewarded with tax breaks, discounted energy bills, faster internet connection, free gym memberships, lower interest rates from banks, and less frequent inspections and audits of one’s business.

Soft and therapeutic totalitarianism comes under the guise of helping and healing. Its victims are culturally blocked from having a prominent public platform or career. They are quietly canceled out of public, social, and professional life, without the threat of jail, torture or death.

As the Charter enters its 41st year of becoming part of Canada’s Constitution, we have not yet seen a great deal of harsh and militaristic tactics used in Canada. In Alberta, three pastors were jailed because Jason Kenney’s government chose to go to court and obtain injunctions to escalate enforcement of health orders, rather than relying on regular law enforcement like the other nine provinces did.

In Ottawa, police arrested peaceful protesters at gunpoint, police horses injured at least one woman, and unarmed protesters were beaten with police truncheons. Pastors in Alberta jails and Emergencies Act brutality aside, authoritarianism in Canada has been mostly of the softer variety.

Many Canadians acquiesced to soft totalitarianism when they accepted vaccine passports from September 2021 to early 2022 with little outcry or protest. A government with the power to exclude you from society over your refusal to get injected with a new substance which lacks long-term safety data can also make you a second-class citizen based on other private and personal decisions that the government deems to be unacceptable.

Why assume that second-class citizenship will be based only on vaccination status, and not on other factors chosen by government, as China has done with its social credit system?

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Tell the CPC to reinstate conservative leadership candidates!
  Show Petition Text
5154 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 6000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Is the Conservative Party of Canada giving pro-life candidates the cold shoulder in this year's leadership race?

That's what many Canadians have been left to wonder after the CPC recently announced that two conservative, pro-life candidates, Grant Abraham and Joseph Bourgault, would not be eligible to have their names officially placed on the ballot for party leader, even after seemingly meeting all requirements to do so.

Could this be a case of the CPC establishment arbitrarily picking winners and losers in the ongoing leadership election? And, if so, are true conservatives like Abraham and Bourgault the ones being unfairly targeted?

We must ask ourselves -- and the CPC -- these questions.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition calling on the Leadership Election Organizing Committee (LEOC) of the Conservative Party to immediately reinstate Grant Abraham and Joseph Borgault onto the ballot for party leader in this year's election immediately.

While Grant Abraham, an attorney from British Columbia and Joseph Bourgault, a businessman from Saskatchewan, may not be as well-known as some of their opponents running for Conservative Party Leader, they still managed, with hard work, determination, and grassroots support, to meet all of the stated requirements for their names to be faithfully added to the official CPC leadership ballot for this year's election on September 10th.

According to the CPC, these requirements are for candidates to raise $300,000 and obtain 500 petition signatures -- both of which Abraham and Bourgault actually achieved.

Abraham actually had raised $300,000 for the entry fee, in addition to submitting 598 petition signatures, and, likewise, Bourgault raised nearly $400,000, and submitted over 1,000 petition signatures.

SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to the CPC now!

Yet even so, the CPC confirmed to the candidates late last weekend that neither had made the final cut because they added a 15% "administration fee" in addition to the $300,000 -- making the actual total they would have needed to raise closer to $350,000 (which, remarkably, still wouldn't explain why at least Bourgault was denied access to the ballot).

Abraham has gone on record declaring that this was false advertising by the party, and that the additional administration fee was never actually communicated to them by the CPC prior to their rejection.

Only four pro-life candidates entered the race for CPC leader this year, and two of them were Abraham and Bourgault.

A third, MP Marc Dalton, failed to meet the fundraising requirements set forth by the party, and a fourth, former leadership candidate and current MP Leslyn Lewis, made it onto the ballot.

So, is the CPC squeezing out conservative, pro-life candidates wherever possible? Are they breaking their own rules to suit the party's establishment, instead of the Canadian people?

It seems that fake conservatives in the CPC establishment are guilty of the same corrupt, power-hungry tendencies they often criticize Liberals for embracing.

Conservatives must demand justice: SIGN and SHARE this petition demanding that members of the Conservative Party's LEOC take immediate action to reinstate Abraham and Bourgault onto the official ballot for CPC Leader.

Both Abraham and Bourgault intend to appeal this grossly unethical and ideologically-discriminatory decision themselves, but they also need support from Canadians like YOU to get the message across!

Thank you!

P.S.  You can support LIFE by attending this year's National March for Life in Ottawa on May 12th! Learn more HERE.


FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Two pro-life candidates for Conservative Party leadership were disqualified despite raising enough money' (LifeSiteNews)

'Canadian MP Leslyn Lewis becomes only remaining pro-life candidate for Conservative Party leadership' (LifeSiteNews)

**Photo Credit:  Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

Vaccine passports were imposed in spite of the fact that COVID is not the Spanish Flu of 1918, as was claimed by Dr. Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London in March of 2020, causing the world-wide panic that led to lockdowns. Vaccine passports were imposed after every provincial government in Canada had a full 18 months to increase hospital capacity to make room for COVID patients.

Governments then kept vaccine passports in place long after vaccine manufacturers themselves had stated publicly that the vaccines do not stop the spread. Vaccine passports were still kept in place even after it had become obvious to everyone that vaccines were not stopping the Delta and Omicron variants from spreading.

Vaccine passports were kept in place even while so many vaccinated Canadians got sick with COVID. Regarding Canadians who have not had two covid shots, the Federal Government continues to violate their Charter right to enter, remain in, and leave Canada. Even flying within Canada is illegal for Canadians who exercise their Charter right to bodily autonomy. In short, don’t expect governments to follow science, other than political science.

The digital ID and other new technologies will empower governments to control all aspects of Canadians’ lives. For example, the government could very easily create the “love passport” or the “tolerance passport,” to ensure that any Canadian who visits a website that the Prime Minister deems “hateful” will be barred from flying on an airplane.

Domestic and international travel could easily become a privilege for Canadians with the “politically correct” opinions about vaccines, immigration, abortion, lockdowns and other issues, to exclude the “racists, misogynists, anti-science extremists” who were so denounced by our Prime Minister in 2021.

Of course, these new and bigger violations of Charter rights and freedoms will be sold and presented as “scientific,” convenient, and for the common good, in just the same way that vaccine passports were sold, promoted, and imposed.

Adding a new digital currency to the digital ID will make it amazingly easy for Canada’s federal and provincial governments to track citizens’ donations, to ensure that nobody is supporting the “wrong” cause, movement, church, synagogue, temple or mosque. The Federal Government used this tactic only two months ago during the freedom convoy, and Canadians have lost jobs over it.

If any of the foregoing sounds conspiratorial, bear in mind that only two years ago it was a “conspiracy theory” that vaccine passports would be imposed on people, and used to pressure or coerce everyone to get injected with a new COVID vaccine. No, the “conspiracy theories” occur everyday in the communist China which Mr. Trudeau so much admires.

Reprinted with permission from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

3 Comments

    Loading...