Opinion
Featured Image
Republican presidential candidates Vivek Ramaswamy and Donald TrumpPhotos by Julie Bennett and Andrew Spear/Getty Images

(American Thinker) — One of Brett Baier’s questions during the Fox News presidential debate of second-stringers on August 23 evoked a memorable moment – and also ignited a RINO-versus-Vivek firestorm among the contestants involved.

“The U.S. has committed nearly $77 billion in aid to the Ukraine war,” Baier said. “The administration is now asking Congress for $24 billion more. Regardless of the specifics of that plan, is there anyone on stage who would not support the increase of more funding to Ukraine?”

READ: GoFundMe freezes $90k from news outlet that opposes neocon Ukraine war narrative

The question evoked memories of Dwight Eisenhower, not only perhaps the greatest military leader in American history besides George Washington himself, but who also served as our 34th president.

On January 17, 1961, just three days before John Kennedy’s inauguration, Ike gave one of the best known farewell addresses in presidential history. After eight years of unmatched American prosperity, with America the world’s sole superpower, Ike could have patted himself on the back for a job well done.

Instead, he famously warned Americans against the “military-industrial complex,” stating, “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” Ike added, “The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”

Military leaders who have been in the midst of war, who know the stench of battle and the smell of gunpowder and who saw bleeding comrades dying on the ground, are the most sober about advocating against military action without just cause and deliberate reasoning.

Now back to Baier’s question about the Ukraine War and the candidates’ responses.

First, we have Vivek Ramaswamy, who, like a kid excited about his first toy under the Christmas tree, immediately shot his hand up to the “who would oppose more funding” question, promising to end military aid to Ukraine, without hesitation, and with unfettered decisiveness. No question where Vivek stood.

Then came Ron DeSantis, now competing with Vivek for second place, way behind Trump in the polls, who tried a one-foot-in, one-foot-out-of-the-pool approach.

Looking around to see how other candidates would respond, DeSantis literally raised his hand halfway up and, without committing fully one way or the other, half-heartedly declared that “Europe needs to step up… I would have Europe step up and do their job,” as if he had power over Europe, and as if Ukraine were a member of NATO, which it is not.

So DeSantis distinguished himself as wishy-washy next to Vivek’s decisiveness. Nonetheless, DeSantis wants the war, apparently. He just wants Europe to help America with the costs.

Equally telling as DeSantis’ wavering was the absolute resolution from the other candidates, who, all going full blown anti-Vivek, were gung-ho on America’s expensive and dangerous proxy war against Russia.

READ: UK gov’t begins new internet censorship efforts one day after passing Online Safety Bill

In one exchange, former Vice President Mike Pence lectured Vivek on the virtues of warmongering. “[A]nybody that thinks that we can’t solve the problems here in the United States and be the leader of the free world has a pretty small view of the greatest nation on Earth… We can do both, Vivek. We’ve done both. We’ve been the leader of the free world, the arsenal of democracy for years.”

Clearly, Pence advocates that the government spend borrowed money like an out-of-control drunken sailor about to puke all over the floor and die from alcohol poisoning. The danger of triggering World War III aside, Pence’s spend-a-holic philosophy emerged as clear as a black fly on his white head in a debate against Kamala Harris.

But it wasn’t just Pence who finger-wagged at Vivek.

When Vivek called out Chris Christie for traveling to Ukraine to kiss Zelensky’s ring, Christie shot back, “All right, look, I did go to Ukraine. And I went to Ukraine, because I wanted to see for myself what Vladimir Putin’s army was doing to the free Ukrainian people.” And then, as if the Russian army were amassed just across the Rio Grande, Christie declared, “If we don’t stand up against this type of autocratic killing in the world, we will be next.”

Not to be outdone, Nikki Haley one-upped Christie’s melodrama: “Putin has said if Russia – once Russia takes Ukraine, Poland and the Baltics are next. That’s world war. We’re trying to prevent war!”

Of course, Putin never verbally threatened Poland or the Baltics, but don’t let the facts get in the way of a little neocon melodrama, Nikki.

During the debate, Vivek reminded Nikki of her “future career on the boards of Lockheed and Raytheon.” Ouch.

READ: Trudeau gov’t pledges $650 million in additional funds to Ukraine during Zelenskyy’s visit to Canada

Neocon Republicans Pence, Christie, Haley, and others sound like war-mongering Democrats. Witness Biden himself stumbling through his teleprompter in Vilnius on July 12. “We will not waver. I mean that. Our commitment to Ukraine will not weaken. We will stand for liberty and freedom today, tomorrow, and for as long as it takes.”

It’s as if these fools don’t care about America’s exploding mega-debt, now north of $33 trillion – nearly $100,000 of debt for every living American.

Of course, neocon Republicans on the debate stage aren’t the only neocons pawing for endless war spending in Ukraine. Queue up BoltonGrahamRomney, Biden, Pelosi, Reed, and Angus King. In this regard, the globalist neocon Republicans parrot war-mongering Democrats. They call it a “uniparty” for a reason: spending our money, spending us into oblivion, gaining power now for themselves, sabotaging America’s future.

Love him or hate him, Julian Assange is right about one thing: it’s no longer about winning wars, it is about endless wars. That would seem to be the case in Afghanistan, where we remained for 20 years, left the place more destabilized than we found it, and left our enemies with billions in military hardware.

Eisenhower warned against this, and only Trump seems to have gotten it.

As Trump said in South Carolina recently, “We’re at the brink of World War III, just in case anybody doesn’t know it. As president, I will bring back peace through strength.”

Trump said in recent days that when he returns to the White House, he will end the Russian-Ukraine war within 24 hours.

Whether the former president means this literally or metaphorically is beside the point. The point is that, unlike RINOs and Democrat war-mongers, Trump remains opposed to fueling a dangerous war in Ukraine that’s not in America’s best interest. Trump began calling for the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in 2011, the year U.S. Navy SEALs killed Bin Laden, and in 2016, he called the Iraq War a “big, fat mistake.”

As president, Trump began withdrawing troops from Afghanistan and, unlike the Bushes and Obama, never started new wars. As Tucker Carlson said, Trump is “the only person with stature in the Republican Party” who is stopping to ask, “Why are we supporting an endless war in Ukraine?”

READ: Trudeau’s ex-‘special rapporteur’ on Chinese meddling gave millions in contracts to preferred consultants

Ironically, Trump, who rebuilt the United States military more than any president since Reagan, stands as the greatest champion for world peace among major figures in the United States.

Other leaders around the world recognize this. Recently, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán told Tucker Carlson that the only path to ending the war in Ukraine would be the re-election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency. Orbán is probably right.

We can only pray that neocon Republicans and warmongering Democrats don’t start World War III before then. We could all stand to learn a lesson from Ike… and from Trump, too.

Reprinted with permission from American Thinker.

19 Comments

    Loading...