Opinion
Featured Image
 IMAGINESTOCK/Getty Images

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

(The Daily Sceptic) – The latest ONS data on deaths by vaccination status show that of the 5,678 COVID deaths in April and May, 93 percent or 5,276 were of vaccinated people. Given that the government’s Coronavirus Dashboard reports that 93 percent of the over-12 population had a first dose of the vaccine, 87 percent had a second dose, and 70 percent had a third dose, these real-world data suggest that the vaccinated did no better than the unvaccinated in being protected against death.

Breaking this down by age does not improve the outlook. In the 50–59 age cohort, in April 86 percent and in May 87 percent of the deaths were of vaccinated people, compared to 87 percent of the cohort vaccinated with at least one dose. In the 60–69 cohort, in April 88 percent and in May 91 percent of the deaths were of vaccinated people, compared to 91 percent of the cohort.

In the 70–79 cohort, in April 94 percent and in May 90 percent of the deaths were of vaccinated people, compared to 92 percent of the cohort. In the 80-plus cohort, in April and May 94 percent of the deaths were of vaccinated people, compared to 94 percent of the cohort. Note that ONS’s definition of a COVID death includes deaths where COVID is mentioned anywhere on the death certificate, not necessarily as the underlying cause.

Many readers will be familiar with the ongoing debate about vaccination statistics and the size of the unvaccinated population. We know how many people have been vaccinated with the first, second, third, and fourth doses of vaccine but we don’t know what the population of the U.K. is so we can’t know exactly what percentage of the population the vaccinated represent.

However, we can have a pretty good guess. Figure 1 is taken from the COVID dashboard and shows that just over 90 percent of the population had a first dose, just under 90 percent had a second dose, and just under 70 percent had a third dose.

Figure 1

Of course, vaccine take-up varies greatly with age and vaccine efficacy (or lack of efficacy) depends on how many doses you’ve had and when you had your last dose.

Figure 2 shows vaccine uptake for the first three rounds of vaccine, though not the spring second booster campaign among over-75s. On the right-hand-side of the chart I’ve drawn the 90 percent, 80 percent, and 70 percent lines in red to make reading easier. I’ve then written in red the age cohorts that fall in various percentage tranches. Broadly speaking, 90 percent of people over the age of 70 have had all three doses, whereas, if you look at the 50–59-year-olds, you’ll see that only about 75 percent have gone on to have the booster dose.

I’ve then inserted a table showing the approximate uptake of the various vaccine doses by age cohort that will then be used to compare vaccine uptake to the death data.

Figure 2

I should add that this level of accuracy is somewhat spurious and overstates the percentage of the various age cohorts that have taken up the vaccines.

There’s been quite a lot of controversy about the percentage take up of vaccine due to the mystery surrounding the U.K.’s population. The problem was first addressed by Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter, who brought up the complications around the NIMS and ONS datasets; I wrote a piece taking issue with some of his findings here.

Professor Norman Fenton also covered this in his recent critical review of the BBC’s “Unvaccinated.”  I won’t revisit the debate here except to say that I think most would agree that the estimates for the proportion of people vaccinated by age group tend to be a bit overstated, so let’s simply regard them as a ceiling.

It’s perhaps also worth noting that Professor Fenton has also criticised the ONS data for undercounting COVID deaths, but, as with the percentage of vaccine uptake, I’m going to use the ONS’s figures as that is what the government has published.

The ONS published “Deaths by vaccination status, England” on July 6. I, along with many others, had been complaining that since the end of March there had been no raw data released showing deaths by vaccination status. It was a pleasant surprise to me that this new report made good this shortfall and included deaths by vaccination status for April and May.

Figure 3 shows the count of COVID deaths by vaccination status for April and May 2022. In April there were 4,119 Covid deaths, of which 3,837 were of people vaccinated with at least one dose, that’s 93 percent of the total. In May, 1,559 COVID deaths were recorded, 1,439 of which were of vaccinated people, that’s 92 percent of the total.

These figures are in line with the proportion of deaths amongst the vaccinated being shown in the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) data up to the point when the data stopped being published at the end of March. The final report can be found here, with the real-world data found in tables 12 and 13, which show that the proportion of deaths by vaccination status were much the same then as in April and May.

Figure 3

The maximum percentage of the population vaccinated is just over 90 percent, yet the percentage of deaths in April and May was also over 90 percent. Why is this important? Because, what’s always needed in any experiment is a “control group,” a group of people who didn’t participate in the experimental drug, vaccine, or whatever was the subject of the study. If the vaccines are effective in preventing deaths you’d expect to see a higher rate of fatalities among the people who didn’t take the vaccines. But we don’t.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
100113 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

Let’s go into a little more detail. Around 99 percent of the deaths in April and May occurred in the over-50s, so I’ll only look at these older age groups.

Figure 4

In the 50–59 age cohort there were 105 deaths in April and 47 in May. In April 86 percent and in May 87 percent of the deaths were of vaccinated people. The third column in grey shows the estimated percentage of people in this age cohort who had either no vaccine or the various doses.

The unvaccinated do not appear to have suffered disproportionately to the vaccinated. While at least 13 percent of this cohort have never had any vaccine dose at all, they accounted for less than 14 percent of the deaths in April and May.

Figure 5

Figure 5 shows that it’s the same story in the 60–69-year-old cohort. In April there were 284 deaths of which 250 or 88 percent were of vaccinated people. In May 106 of the 117 deaths or 91 percent were vaccinated. The proportion of deaths was in line with the proportion of the vaccinated in that age group. If the vaccines had no effect this is exactly what you’d expect to see.

Figure 6

Figure 6 tells the same story for the over 70s: deaths from COVID are proportionately the same for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. About 91 percent are vaccinated and over 90 percent of deaths were among the vaccinated.

And finally, figure 7 shows the situation for the 80-plus cohort. In this age cohort, just about everyone who had the first dose turned up for their second and third dose and quite probably their fourth dose too, but it doesn’t seem to have made much difference to the outcome. Again, it’s perfectly clear that with 94 percent of the deaths occurring amongst the vaccinated, the 6 percent unvaccinated are proportionately no more at risk that the vaccinated.

Figure 7

Similar findings were reported in The Daily Sceptic recently for Canada and the Netherlands so this isn’t British exceptionalism.

Why might this be? Waning efficacy perhaps. However, they’ve been at this level for some months, suggesting that isn’t the whole story. Maybe the unvaccinated are a self-selecting group who are disproportionately healthy or have been previously infected – though if so that would need to be shown not assumed.

Whatever the reason, the ONS data clearly raise important questions that need addressing. They seem to confirm that in the real world, regardless of how many doses of vaccines someone may have, it makes absolutely no difference to the likelihood that they may die from COVID.

Reprinted with permission from The Daily Sceptic.

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

1 Comments

    Loading...