Many legacy journalists now find themselves in the uncomfortable position of being called out for their collusion with people who have worked to deceive the public about the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 originated in a lab.
The media may have gotten what they wanted in its continuous smog of false stories, debunkings, ignorings, and lies to Get Trump, but it's done so at a steep price: its credibility.
In March, the Wuhan Institute of Virology deleted mentions of its collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, directed by Dr. Anthony Fauci. It also deleted descriptions of gain-of-function research on the SARS virus.
Saager Enjeti, host of “The Hill’s Rising With Krystal and Saagar,” discusses an admission from a former New York Times science journalist who said he initially refused to investigate the COVID lab-leak theory because he trusted the word of Dr. Anthony Fauci and other industry players.
Fox News commentator, Tucker Carlson, cited a recent article by Nicholas Wade outlining how Dr. Anthony Fauci approved funding for the controversial gain-of-function research in Wuhan that, according to Wade, led to the pandemic.
‘I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped,’ Dr. Robert Redfield said in a CNN interview.