With a failing counteroffensive, a retiring leader, and a pivotal summit looming, NATO is an organization which seems pressed for time and short on results.
‘An attack on a critical infrastructure which ensures the safe supply of any country must be considered as an attack on the sovereignty of that given country,’ Peter Szijjarto said.
The Green-Left coalition is printing money to pay for the price rises caused by its own policies, in order that its industry does not immediately collapse. Does this look like a 'sustainable development' to you?
'The United States was the first country to return to the scene of the crime… and removed the unexploded charge along the fourth pipeline, which failed to detonate,' journalist Seymour Hersh stated.
How secure is any alliance in which the dominant partner attacks its allies? How stable is the vaunted 'rules based order' when destroying your allies’ energy supply is permitted?