'My statements do not have a direct canonical consequence as I have not formally refused to recognize a pope chosen in a future conclave,' writes Bishop Strickland.
While Pope Francis strays into modern politics, the Catholic faithful must remember the days of Arius to ‘hold fast to what was handed down’ from the apostles and support those clergy and laymen who refuse to follow the overwhelming majority of the bishops into error.
How can we say we love our brothers—our countrymen, who we see around us everyday—if we deprive them of what we owe them, and give it instead to those we don’t see, on the other side of the world?
Pope Francis has launched a direct challenge to President Donald Trump's immigration policies in a Tuesday letter to U.S. bishops. The Pope's stance aligns with his past blanket claims that repelling migrants is a mortal sin.
In this piece, we will challenge the USCCB's vision on immigration with reference to the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, the 'social encyclicals' of the nineteenth and twentieth century popes and the nature of civil society itself.
Considering Gentile de Fabriano’s Adoration of the Magi (1423), discover the coherent portrayal of God’s loving condescension into human history, the call of pilgrimage and conversion for humanity, and the exalted humility of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
In conclusion, against the position of Matt Gaspers (and others) it seems it simply must be the case that a public material heretic Pope loses office before any declaratory action on the part of the Church.
Both Lamont and McCusker fail to consider Bellarmine’s teaching in De Ecclesia, in which he lists six reasons 'on account of which Councils are celebrated,' and '[t]he fourth reason is suspicion of heresy in the Roman Pontiff.'
Saints and popes have taught for centuries that the faith of the successors of Peter cannot fail and that they cannot teach error. Has Pope Francis proven all of them wrong or is there a simpler answer?