Justice Alito says ‘egregiously wrong’ Roe v. Wade lacks historical, legal precedent
’It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.’
•
Articles tagged Stare Decisis
Roe v. Wade is indefensible on every level. Will the Supreme Court admit it?
The facts are obvious. Whether our justices will follow them is not.
•
Hawley, Cruz, Lee file amicus brief calling on Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade
'As the Court has repeatedly explained over the course of many decades, decisions that have proven unworkable — by producing confusion in the lower courts, failing to result in judicially manageable standards, and proving doctrinally unstable — are prime candidates for reversal," the senators argue.
•
-100x100.jpg)
Barrett: Roe not ‘super precedent,’ not entitled to automatically be upheld
The Supreme Court nominee told Sen. Amy Klobuchar that the abortion decision is 'not a case that everyone has accepted.'
•
-100x100.jpg)
How Amy Coney Barrett will use science and legal principles to overturn Roe v. Wade
'Not long after Amy Coney Barrett joins the court as Justice Barrett, I am convinced, America’s long national abortion nightmare will begin to come to an end'
•
Barrett, Rushing, Lagoa: Whom will Trump put on the Supreme Court?
All eyes are currently on three women widely believed to be finalists for the vacancy.
•
‘Unreal,’ ‘unjust’: Conservatives react to SCOTUS ruling helping ‘genocidal’ abortion industry
The Supreme Court yesterday struck down a Louisiana law requiring basic medical precautions in the event of abortion complications.
•
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas: Roe v. Wade ‘should be overruled’
'The Constitution does not constrain the States’ ability to regulate or even prohibit abortion,' wrote Justice Thomas. 'Moreover, the fact that no five Justices can agree on the proper interpretation of our precedents today evinces that our abortion jurisprudence remains in a state of utter entropy.'
•
Kavanaugh mentions Roe v. Wade in opinion about overturning ‘erroneous precedents’
The discussion does little to clarify how Kavanaugh would vote if the court ever revisits the merits of Roe and Casey during his term
•
Clarence Thomas says Supreme Court shouldn’t follow ‘erroneous precedent,’ possibly upending Roe
Justice Thomas: We shouldn't follow 'erroneous precedent'
•