SACRAMENTO, California (LifeSiteNews) – A group of California Democrats in the state capital continues to work on a package of COVID mandates, including a shot requirement that would apply to all workers in the state.
The “Vaccine Work Group” has a series of bills focused on getting as many people as possible to get jabbed and ensuring that future virus lockdowns are enforced by law enforcement officials.
“Taken together, the adoption of these bills would make California an outlier among states — and give it the country’s strictest COVID-19 regulations,” Cal Matters reported.
The bills include an inoculation requirement for all children at “any public or private elementary or secondary school, childcare center, day nursery, nursery school, family day care home, or development center.” It would add COVID-19 to the list of “childhood diseases” that kids are required to have inoculations against as a condition of enrollment. It would prohibit any “personal belief exemption.”
COVID-19 has never been a serious threat for children, especially the majority of kids who do not have any underlying conditions.
Kids from 0 to 17 represent .01 percent of all U.S. deaths from the virus, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The requirement also ignores the risks posed to people who take the COVID-19 shot. Dr. Doran Fink with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) previously said during a September 2021 vaccine safety committee meeting that men under 40 are at greater risk of hospitalization from COVID shots than the virus.
But that has not stopped the push to allow kids to get jabbed without their parent’s knowledge and to require healthy individuals to take the abortion-tainted shots.
Joe Biden’s pick to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer on the U.S. Supreme Court is abortion defender D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first black woman nominated to the nation's highest court ever.
By choosing Brown Jackson, Biden is fulfilling two campaign promises at the same time: first, to use every tool at his disposal to defend and promote the killing of the most innocent; and, second, to make the nation’s highest court more "diverse."
Of course, Biden could have achieved "diversity" by different means (and, as a "Catholic," he should have), but, as throughout the rest of tenure in office, he has chosen to pursue the deadly path of promoting abortion.
And, make no mistake: Planned Parenthood and NARAL are ecstatic about Brown Jackson.
SIGN and SHARE this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.
Unlike most previous nominees to the Supreme Court, Brown Jackson has a judicial history of supporting abortion - which should be enough to cause Senators to reject her.
In the 1990s, she wrote an amicus brief defending a Massachusetts law that banned protests outside of abortion clinics. Thankfully, the law was ruled unconstitutional in 2000, but it shows how Brown Jackson intends to use the law to silence free speech so that the killing can continue without protest.
Pro-lifers are unanimous in their opposition to Brown Jackson, while the pro-abortionists are undivided in their zeal for her nomination.
SIGN and SHARE this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.
Carrie Severino, president of the pro-life Judicial Crisis Network, warned of an imminent free speech threat, stating that in her "buffer-zone" amicus brief, Brown Jackson "repeatedly disparaged the peaceful and often prayerful clinic protesters as engaging in ‘in-your-face’ and ‘chaotic’ activity that somehow fell short of ‘pure speech.’"
And, Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List stated her organization's opposition to Brown Jackson's nomination, saying: "She is on record opposing the free speech rights of pro-life advocates pleading to save lives outside abortion centers and supporting the false claim that abortion is ‘health care.’"
But, the country's top abortion groups are celebrating Brown Jackson’s appointment.
Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson wrote in a tweet addressed to Jackson: "We can’t wait to see the fantastic work you will do and will be here to support you along the way,"
And, NARAL Pro-Choice America President Mini Timmaraju agreed.
"Judge Jackson … has a demonstrated record of defending and upholding our constitutional rights and fundamental freedoms — including reproductive freedom," Timmaraju said. "We are confident that she will be a voice for justice, equity, and freedom on the Court in the decades to come."
Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition which urges all U.S. Senators to reject abortion activist Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Biden announces Ketanji Brown Jackson to replace Stephen Breyer on Supreme Court' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/biden-announces-ketanji-brown-jackson-to-replace-stephen-breyer-on-supreme-court/
'Pro-life groups warn about Biden’s Supreme Court nominee' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-life-groups-warn-about-bidens-supreme-court-nominee/
'These Republicans could help Biden install his far-left Supreme Court pick' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/these-republicans-could-help-biden-his-left-wing-supreme-court-pick/
**Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Other proposed legislation includes allowing children 12 to 17 to get jabbed without their parent’s consent and a statewide vaccine mandate for all workers, including independent contractors.
The worker jab mandate would go into effect on January 1, 2023, if the bill passes, and stay in effect until the “the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices determines that COVID-19 vaccinations are no longer necessary for the health and safety of individuals.”
Another bill would require that law enforcement enforce every COVID requirement, including mandates, or lose funding.
“The bill would additionally prohibit state funds from being provided to any law enforcement agency that publicly announces that they will oppose, or adopts a policy to oppose, a public health order,” Senate Bill 1464 states.
Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva has been outspoken against requiring his deputies to get jabbed.
Another piece of legislation takes aim at “disinformation” and “misinformation,” including one proposal to yank medical licenses from doctors.
The “dissemination or promotion of misinformation or disinformation related to the SARS-CoV-2” would be considered “unprofessional conduct” and could lead to a loss of license, if AB 2098 becomes law.
This unprofessional conduct would include “false or misleading information regarding the nature and risks of the virus, its prevention and treatment; and the development, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines,” according to the bill’s text.
It is not clear how “misleading information” would be treated, as public health officials have given contradictory advice on masks and vaccines. For example, former Surgeon General Jerome Adams and Dr. Anthony Fauci were both telling people in February and March 2020 not to buy masks and then they supported masking. CNN’s public health analyst and former Planned Parenthood president Dr. Leana Wen referred to cloth face masks as “facial decorations.”
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky has held opposing views on whether the COVID shots prevent transmission of the virus.